Two-stage treatment of ischial pressure ulcers in spinal cord injury patients: Technique and outcomes over 8 years

被引:12
作者
Jordan, Sumanas W. [1 ]
De la Garza, Mauricio [2 ]
Lewis, Victor L., Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Southern Illinois Univ, Sch Med, Inst Plast Surg, Springfield, IL USA
关键词
Ischial pressure ulcer; Muscle flap; Spinal cord injury; Osteomyelitis; MUSCULOCUTANEOUS FLAP; SORE COVERAGE; OSTEOMYELITIS; CLOSURE; RECONSTRUCTION; PREDICTORS; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS; PROTOCOL; THIGH;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2017.01.004
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Despite newly introduced techniques, reconstruction of ischial pressure ulcers remains a difficult problem with high-reported failure rates. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on all spinal cord injury patients who underwent ischial pressure ulcer reconstruction by the senior author (V.L.) between 2004 and 2012. The two-stage procedure consisted of debridement and bone biopsy, followed by bursectomy, partial ischiectomy, fascial release, and gluteus maximus and hamstring advancement flaps. Postoperative care included 2-week supine bed rest on an air-fluidized bed, sitting tolerance rehabilitation, and thorough behavioral training. Results: Sixty-five patients (74 flaps) were identified. A 45.9% had a previous attempt at reconstruction. The median follow-up period was 622 days. Overall, 67.6% of flaps were intact at the last follow-up. Superficial and deep dehiscence rates were 16.2 and 28.4%, respectively. Seven out of 35 flaps suffered late recurrence after being well healed for more than 1 year. History of previous reconstruction was found to be associated with increased odds of superficial (OR 6.02, 95% CI 1.55-23.3) and deep dehiscence (OR 12.3, 95% CI 1.99-76.9). Conclusions: The evolution of the senior author's decades of practice has led to the development of a simpler repair, which relies on plane-by-plane release of scarred tissues to improve the mobility of muscle and skin flaps without large tissue movements, even in the setting of apparent extensive tissue loss. This technique is a reliable option, particularly for the primary ischial pressure ulcer. (C) 2017 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:959 / 966
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Baek S M, 1981, Ann Plast Surg, V7, P508, DOI 10.1097/00000637-198112000-00017
[2]   Major risk factors for pressure ulcers in the spinal cord disabled: A literature review [J].
Byrne, DW ;
Salzberg, CA .
SPINAL CORD, 1996, 34 (05) :255-263
[3]  
CONSTANTIAN MB, 1980, PRESSURE ULCERS PRIN
[4]  
Davis JS, 1938, SURGERY, V3, P1
[5]   EFFICACY OF OPERATIVE CURE IN PRESSURE SORE PATIENTS [J].
DISA, JJ ;
CARLTON, JM ;
GOLDBERG, NH .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1992, 89 (02) :272-278
[6]   Factors associated with the development of pressure ulcers after spinal cord injury [J].
Eslami, V. ;
Saadat, S. ;
Arejan, R. Habibi ;
Vaccaro, A. R. ;
Ghodsi, S. M. ;
Rahimi-Movaghar, V. .
SPINAL CORD, 2012, 50 (12) :899-903
[7]  
European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, 2009, TREATM PRESS ULC QUI
[8]  
Foster RD, 1997, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V132, P868
[9]   Profile and costs of secondary conditions resulting in emergency department presentations and readmission to hospital following traumatic spinal cord injury [J].
Gabbe, Belinda J. ;
Nunn, Andrew .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2016, 47 (08) :1847-1855
[10]   Pressure ulcer risk in spinal cord injury: Predictors of ulcer status over 3 years [J].
Garber, SL ;
Rintala, DH ;
Hart, KA ;
Fuhrer, MJ .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2000, 81 (04) :465-471