Assessing factorial invariance of two-way rating designs using three-way methods

被引:1
作者
Kroonenberg, Pieter M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Inst Educ & Child Studies, Dept Child & Family Studies, NL-2333 AK Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
stimulus-response data; Tucker3; model; Tucker2; Parafac model; three-mode analysis; rating scales; semantic differentials; Ainsworth strange situation; 3-MODE FACTOR-ANALYSIS; COMPONENT ANALYSIS; CONSTRAINTS; ROTATION; MODELS;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01495
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Assessing the factorial invariance of two-way rating designs such as ratings of concepts on several scales by different groups can be carried out with three-way models such as the Parafac and Tucker models. By their definitions these models are double-metric factorially invariant. The differences between these models lie in their handling of the links between the concept and scale spaces. These links may consist of unrestricted linking (Tucker2 model), invariant component covariances but variable variances per group and per component (Parafac model), zero covariances and variances different per group but not per component (Replicated Tucker3 model) and strict invariance (Component analysis on the average matrix). This hierarchy of invariant models, and the procedures by which to evaluate the models against each other, is illustrated in some detail with an international data set from attachment theory.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Ainsworth S.M., 1978, PATTERNS ATTACHMENT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, HDB ATTACHMENT THEOR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, PROCRUSTES PROBLEMS, DOI [10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198510581.001.0001, DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780198510581.001.0001]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1984, RES METHODS MULTIMOD
[5]  
Bro R, 1998, J CHEMOMETR, V12, P223, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-128X(199807/08)12:4<223::AID-CEM511>3.3.CO
[6]  
2-U
[7]   FACTOR ROTATION FOR PROPORTIONAL PROFILES: ANALYTICAL SOLUTION AND AN EXAMPLE [J].
Cattell, R. B. ;
Cattell, A. K. S. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1955, 8 :83-92
[8]  
Harshman R., 1970, Foundations of the parafac procedure: Models and conditions for an" explanatory" multimodal factor analysis, V16, P1, DOI DOI 10.1134/S0036023613040165
[9]   HIERARCHICAL RELATIONS AMONG 3-WAY METHODS [J].
KIERS, HAL .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1991, 56 (03) :449-470
[10]  
KRIJNEN WP, 1995, COMPUTATION STAT, V10, P299