The status of open access library and information science journals in SSCI

被引:15
作者
Chen, Ming [1 ]
Du, Yunfei [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Univ North Texas, Denton, TX USA
关键词
Open access; Citation analysis; Open access journals; IMPACT FACTORS;
D O I
10.1108/EL-05-2015-0070
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Purpose - The main purpose of this paper is to measure the status and quality of library and information science (LIS) open-access (OA) journals in the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI). Design/methodology/approach - The study selected 86 source journals of LIS in the SSCI as a sample and measured their status of open access. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used to analyze 36 OA journals of 86 source journals, especially their production capability, academic influence and network communication ability. Findings - The results indicate that OA journals have become an increasingly important part of LIS journals. Production capability, academic influence and network communication ability are important factors affecting the quality of OA journals. These three evaluation indicators of LIS OA journals are high, but many still have room for improvement. Research limitations/implications - As the paper is limited by collecting data, the indicators of OA journals' quality are not all-around. So, they cannot reflect the quality of LIS OA journals. In the selection of the evaluation method, the evaluation results are limited because only one AHP method is used. Practical implications - The research on evaluation of OA journals can help library and scientific research personnel use OA journals effectively. Identifying key factors on evaluation can help researchers to construct OA journals better. Social implications - The research on OA journals' quality can also promote the study on OA process in academic circles and promote the communication, development and utilization of academic information. Such research can also enrich the theory of OA, and provide some new perspectives for the study of journals' evaluation. Originality/value - This paper measures the quality of LIS OA journals by analyzing production capability, academic influence and network communication ability. Rather than the traditional research methods, the focus of this study is on the value of the Web as a source of impact indices. It contributes to the scholarly impact measurements of OA journals.
引用
收藏
页码:722 / 739
页数:18
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Borgman CL, 2002, ANNU REV INFORM SCI, V36, P3
[2]  
Chan L., 2006, STUDY FEASIBILITY OP
[3]  
Chen M., 2010, LIB INFORM SERVICE, V54, P11
[4]  
Chen M., 2013, DOCUMENT INFORM KNOW, V3, P28
[5]  
Chen Y.P., 2009, MODERN INFORM, V29, P34
[6]   Evolution of open access publishing in Chinese scientific journals [J].
Cheng, Weihong ;
Ren, Shengli .
LEARNED PUBLISHING, 2008, 21 (02) :140-+
[7]  
Du Dong., 2005, Modern Comprehensive Evaluation Methods and Selected Cases
[8]   The calculation of Web impact factors [J].
Ingwersen, P .
JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, 1998, 54 (02) :236-243
[9]  
Ingwersen P., 2006, WEBOMETRICS 10 YEARS
[10]   Motivations for URL citations to open access library and information science articles [J].
Kousha, Kayvan ;
Thelwall, Mike .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2006, 68 (03) :501-517