Satisfaction and Quality of Life in Laryngectomees after Voice Prosthesis Rehabilitation

被引:23
作者
Giordano, Leone [1 ]
Toma, Salvatore [1 ]
Teggi, Roberto [1 ]
Palonta, Francesca [1 ]
Ferrario, Fabrizio [1 ]
Bondi, Stefano [1 ]
Bussi, Mario [1 ]
机构
[1] Vita & Salute Univ, Hosp San Raffaele, ENT Dept, Milan, Italy
关键词
Total laryngectomy; Voice prosthesis; Phonatory valve; HYPOPHARYNGEAL CARCINOMA; RESTORATION; LARYNGEAL; PROVOX; CANCER; SPEECH;
D O I
10.1159/000323185
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objective/Hypothesis: The purpose of the study was to assess the satisfaction and quality of life in laryngectomees after vocal rehabilitation using voice prostheses. We evaluated the impact on quality of life between laryngectomees with voice prostheses, laryngectomees without them and healthy controls. Methods: This was a prospective study on a sample of laryngectomees in an Italian university hospital. Our study population was composed of 42 patients who had previously undergone a total laryngectomy; in 24 of them, voice rehabilitation was obtained with a voice prosthesis device (group A), while 18 of them learned oesophageal voice (group B). The results were compared with a group of 25 healthy controls (group C). In order to investigate the quality of life, we administered the Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) to the 3 groups. Moreover, self-satisfaction of the subjects in group A was assessed by single questions regarding their use of the voice prosthesis. Results: A statistical difference in the SF-36 was detected for social functioning (SF) between groups A and B. Role physical, SF and role emotional were significantly better in group C than in group A. Group A stated they were very satisfied with voice quality while there were still some problems regarding prosthesis lifetime and communication at the telephone or in noisy environments. Conclusions: Voice prosthesis implantation in laryngectomees showed positive effects on patients' quality of life; however, there are still some negative aspects. At present, an early diagnosis of larynx cancer with a partial laryngectomy in order to preserve phonatory function is the gold standard. Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 236
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Ahmad I, 2000, J LARYNGOL OTOL, V114, P522
  • [2] Voice restoration following total laryngectomy by tracheoesophageal prosthesis: Effect on patients' quality of life and voice handicap in Jordan
    Attieh, Abdelrahim Y.
    Searl, Jeff
    Shahaltough, Nada H.
    Wreikat, Mahmoud M.
    Lundy, Donna S.
    [J]. HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2008, 6 (1)
  • [3] History of Voice Rehabilitation Following Laryngectomy
    Bien, Stanislaw
    Rinaldo, Alessandra
    Silver, Carl E.
    Fagan, Johannes J.
    Pratt, Loring W.
    Tarnowska, Czeslawa
    Towpik, Edward
    Weir, Neil
    Folz, Benedikt J.
    Ferlito, Alfio
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2008, 118 (03) : 453 - 458
  • [4] Bilewicz Robert, 2007, Otolaryngol Pol, V61, P265, DOI 10.1016/S0030-6657(07)70424-9
  • [5] ASSESSMENT OF 3 MODES OF ALARYNGEAL SPEECH WITH A SYNTHETIC SENTENCE IDENTIFICATION (SSI) TASK IN VARYING MESSAGE-TO-COMPETITION RATIOS
    CLARK, JG
    STEMPLE, JC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1982, 25 (03): : 333 - 338
  • [6] Culton GL, 1998, OTOLARYNG HEAD NECK, V118, P458, DOI 10.1016/S0194-5998(98)70201-3
  • [7] Survival times of Provox(TM) valves
    deCarpentier, JP
    Ryder, WDJ
    Saeed, SR
    Woolford, TJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 1996, 110 (01) : 37 - 42
  • [8] Prospective randomized comparative study of tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis: Blom-Singer versus Provox
    Delsupehe, K
    Zink, I
    Lejaegere, M
    Delaere, P
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 1998, 108 (10) : 1561 - 1565
  • [9] QUALITY-OF-LIFE AFTER SURGICAL-TREATMENT OF CANCER OF THE LARYNX
    DESANTO, LW
    OLSEN, KD
    PERRY, WC
    ROHE, DE
    KEITH, RL
    [J]. ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1995, 104 (10) : 763 - 769
  • [10] Dropkin M J, 1989, Semin Oncol Nurs, V5, P213, DOI 10.1016/0749-2081(89)90095-8