South-South Knowledge Production and Hegemony: Searching for Africa in Chinese Theories of IR

被引:17
作者
Carrozza, Ilaria [1 ]
Benabdallah, Lina [2 ]
机构
[1] Peace Res Inst Oslo PRIO, Oslo, Norway
[2] Wake Forest Univ, Winston Salem, NC 27101 USA
关键词
global south; international relations theory; knowledge production; Palabras clave; Sur global; teoria de las relaciones internacionales; produccion de conocimiento; Mots cles; pays du sud; theorie des relations internationales; production de connaissances; WORLD-ORDER; DIALOGUE; POLITICS; HEAVEN; POWER; CORE; RISE;
D O I
10.1093/isr/viab063
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
There is a growing community of international relations (IR) scholars who argue for the importance of investigating Global South approaches to IR scholarship, making room for theories and concepts that challenge the discipline's Eurocentricity, and debating the merits and pitfalls of globalizing IR by including perspectives from various Global South locations. In addition to acknowledging this existing critical scholarship that aims at resisting mainstream epistemologies and methodologies of knowing and doing IR, this article's central contribution is to probe the epistemic hegemony and knowledge-production hierarchies that are emerging from within the Global South. The article does not seek to uncover the truth about the representation of Global South actors by Global South IR communities. Instead, it is interested in demonstrating how epistemic hegemony and knowledge-production hierarchies do not exist only in relationships of exclusion and Othering but also in relations of inclusion and Selving. We illustrate our argument with an analysis of the representations of "Africa" in China-based IR intellectual communities. We find that Chinese discourses on solidarity, friendship, community, and shared history lead to a narrative of sameness and Selving whereby Chinese postcolonial experiences are taken to be expandable and applicable to other developing states, making Chinese perspectives seem representative of others, thereby silencing and representing African voices at once.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 96 条
[41]  
Kamola Isaac., 2012, Thinking International Relations Differently, P183
[42]   The Guanxi of Relational International Affairs [J].
Kavalski, Emilian .
CHINESE POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2018, 3 (03) :233-251
[43]  
Kelebogile Zvobgo, 2020, Foreign Policy
[44]  
Khatab S, 2006, ROUTL STUD POL ISLAM, P1
[45]   Will IR Theory with Chinese Characteristics be a Powerful Alternative? [J].
Kim, Hun Joon .
CHINESE JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICS, 2016, 9 (01) :59-79
[46]   The South in "Global IR": Worlding Beyond the "Non-West" in the Case of Brazil [J].
Kristensen, Peter Marcus .
INTERNATIONAL STUDIES PERSPECTIVES, 2021, 22 (02) :218-239
[47]   Domination, Authority, and the Forms of Chinese Power [J].
Lake, David A. .
CHINESE JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICS, 2017, 10 (04) :357-382
[48]   Will China be a New Type of Great Power? [J].
Larson, Deborah Welch .
CHINESE JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICS, 2015, 8 (04) :323-348
[49]  
Li Anshan., 2005, African Studies Review, V48, P59, DOI DOI 10.1353/ARW.2005.0002
[50]   The missing Other: a review of Linklater's Violence and Civilization in the Western States-System [J].
Ling, L. H. M. .
REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES, 2017, 43 (04) :621-636