Claudicating patients with peripheral artery disease have meaningful improvement in walking speed after supervised exercise therapy

被引:15
作者
Rahman, Hafizur [1 ,2 ]
Pipinos, Iraklis I. [2 ,3 ]
Johanning, Jason M. [2 ,3 ]
Casale, George [3 ]
Williams, Mark A. [4 ]
Thompson, Jonathan R. [3 ]
O'Neill-Castro, Yohanis [3 ]
Myers, Sara A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska Omaha, Dept Biomech, 6160 Univ Dr S, Omaha, NE 68182 USA
[2] Vet Affairs Med Ctr Nebraska & Western Iowa, Dept Surg & Res Serv, Omaha, NE USA
[3] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Omaha, NE 68182 USA
[4] Creighton Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Omaha, NE 68178 USA
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
Minimal clinically important difference; Walking speed; Peripheral artery disease; Supervised exercise therapy; MINIMALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; GAIT SPEED; PEOPLE; ADULTS; REVASCULARIZATION; RESPONSIVENESS; QUESTIONNAIRE; DISTANCE; DOMAINS; BENEFIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2021.04.069
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Supervised exercise therapy (SET) is a first-line treatment for patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). The efficacy of SET is most commonly expressed by significant statistical improvement of parameters that do not clarify how each individual patient will benefit from SET. This study examined the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in walking speed in claudicating patients with PAD after SET. Methods: A total of 63 patients with PAD-related claudication (Fontaine stage II PAD) participated in a 6-month SET program. Self-selected walking speed was measured before and after SET. Distribution and anchor-based approaches were used to estimate the MCID for small and substantial improvement. The ability to walk one block and the ability to climb one flight of stairs questions were chosen as anchor questions from the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form questionnaire. Receiver operating characteristics curve analyses were performed to detect the threshold for MCID in walking speed after treatment. Results: The distribution-based method estimated 0.03 m/s as a small improvement and 0.08 m/s as a substantial improvement after SET. Small and substantial improvements according to the anchor question walking one block were 0.05 m/s and 0.15 m/s, respectively. For the climbing one flight of stairs anchor question, 0.10 m/s was a small improvement. Receiver operating characteristics curve analyses identified an increase of 0.04 m/s and 0.03 m/s for improvement based on walking one block and climbing one flight of stairs, respectively. Conclusions: We report our findings for the MCID for walking speed among claudicating patients receiving SET. Claudicating patients who increase walking speed of 0.03 m/s or greater are more likely to experience a meaningful improvement in walking impairment than those who do not. The MCID reported in this study can serve as a benchmark for clinicians to develop goals and interpret clinically meaningful progress in the care of claudicating patients with PAD.
引用
收藏
页码:1987 / 1995
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Understanding diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic curves [J].
Akobeng, Anthony K. .
ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2007, 96 (05) :644-647
[2]   Meaningful Improvement in Gait Speed in Hip Fracture Recovery [J].
Alley, Dawn E. ;
Hicks, Gregory E. ;
Shardell, Michelle ;
Hawkes, William ;
Miller, Ram ;
Craik, Rebecca L. ;
Mangione, Kathleen K. ;
Orwig, Denise ;
Hochberg, Marc ;
Resnick, Barbara ;
Magaziner, Jay .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2011, 59 (09) :1650-1657
[3]  
American College of Sports M, 2013, ACSMS GUIDELINES EXE, V9th
[4]   Minimal clinically important difference for change in comfortable gait speed of adults with pathology: a systematic review [J].
Bohannon, Richard W. ;
Glenney, Susan S. .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2014, 20 (04) :295-300
[5]   Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20-79 years: Reference values and determinants [J].
Bohannon, RW .
AGE AND AGEING, 1997, 26 (01) :15-19
[6]   Clinical Prediction Rules, Part 1: Conceptual Overview [J].
Bruce, Scott L. ;
Wilkerson, Gary B. .
ATHLETIC THERAPY TODAY, 2010, 15 (02) :4-9
[7]   Determining the Minimally Important Difference for the VascuQol Sumscore and Its Domains in Patients with Intermittent Claudication [J].
Conijn, A. P. ;
Bipat, S. ;
Reekers, J. A. ;
Koelemay, M. J. W. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 51 (04) :550-556
[8]   Introducing the Concept of the Minimally Important Difference to Determine a Clinically Relevant Change on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients with Intermittent Claudication [J].
Conijn, Anne P. ;
Jonkers, Wilma ;
Rouwet, Ellen V. ;
Vahl, Anco C. ;
Reekers, Jim A. ;
Koelemay, Mark J. W. .
CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 38 (05) :1112-1118
[9]   Identifying Clinically Meaningful Benchmarks for Gait Improvement After Total Hip Arthroplasty [J].
Foucher, Kharma C. .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2016, 34 (01) :88-96
[10]   Statistical or Clinical Improvement? Determining the Minimally Important Difference for the Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia [J].
Frans, F. A. ;
Nieuwkerk, P. T. ;
Met, R. ;
Bipat, S. ;
Legemate, D. A. ;
Reekers, J. A. ;
Koelemay, M. J. W. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 47 (02) :180-186