The effect of nafamostat mesilate infusion after ERCP for post-ERCP pancreatitis

被引:6
作者
Kim, Joo Seong [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Sang Hyub [1 ]
Park, Namyoung [1 ,3 ]
Huh, Gunn [1 ,4 ]
Chun, Jung Won [1 ,5 ]
Choi, Jin Ho [1 ]
Cho, In Rae [1 ]
Paik, Woo Hyun [1 ]
Ryu, Ji Kon [1 ]
Kim, Yong-Tae [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Liver Res Inst, Dept Internal Med,Coll Med,Div Gastroenterol, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[2] Dongguk Univ, Ilsan Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Coll Med, Goyang Si 10326, South Korea
[3] Kyung Hee Univ Hosp Gangdong, Dept Internal Med, Seoul 05278, South Korea
[4] Univ Ulsan, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Coll Med, Seoul 05505, South Korea
[5] Natl Canc Ctr, Ctr Liver & Pancreatobiliary Canc, Goyang Si 10408, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
关键词
Nafamostat; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Post-ERCP pancreatitis; PREVENTION; GABEXATE; COMPLICATIONS; EFFICACY; MESYLATE;
D O I
10.1186/s12876-022-02345-3
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Nafamostat mesilate decreases the incidence of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, no studies have administered nafamostat mesilate after ERCP. So we investigated if the infusion of nafamostat mesilate after ERCP can affect the post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) in high-risk patients. Methods In a tertiary hospital, 350 high-risk patients of PEP were reviewed retrospectively. Among them, 201 patients received nafamostat mesilate after ERCP. Patient-related and procedure-related risk factors for PEP were collected. We performed a propensity score matching to adjust for the significant different baseline characteristics. The incidence and severity of PEP were evaluated according to the infusion of nafamostat mesilate. The risk factors of PEP were also analyzed by multivariate logistic regression. Results The baseline characteristics were not different after the matching. The PEP rate (17.4% vs. 10.3%, P = 0.141) was insignificant. Among the PEP patients, mild PEP was significantly higher in the nafamostat mesilate group (85.7% vs. 45.5%, P = 0.021). Only one patient in the nafamostat mesilate group developed severe PEP. Although young age (odds ratio [OR] 3.60, 95% CI 1.09-11.85, P = 0.035) was a risk factor, nafamostat mesilate (odds ratio [OR] 0.30, 95% CI 0.09-0.98, P = 0.047) was a protective factor for moderate to severe PEP. Conclusions The administration of nafamostat mesilate after ERCP in high-risk patients was not effective in preventing PEP, but may attenuate the severity of PEP.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Pharmacologic treatment can prevent pancreatic injury after ERCP: a meta-analysis [J].
Andriulli, A ;
Leandro, G ;
Niro, G ;
Mangia, A ;
Festa, V ;
Gambassi, G ;
Villani, MR ;
Facciorusso, D ;
Conoscitore, P ;
Spirito, F ;
De Maio, G .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 51 (01) :1-7
[2]   A Tutorial and Case Study in Propensity Score Analysis: An Application to Estimating the Effect of In-Hospital Smoking Cessation Counseling on Mortality [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2011, 46 (01) :119-151
[3]   Gabexate for the prevention of pancreatic damage related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [J].
Cavallini, G ;
Tittobello, A ;
Frulloni, L ;
Masci, E ;
Mariani, A ;
DiFrancesco, V ;
Angelini, GP ;
Casarini, MB ;
Bedogni, G ;
Conigliaro, R ;
Bonardi, L ;
Khajekini, MTA ;
Cipolletta, L ;
Bianco, MA ;
Costamagna, G ;
Perri, V ;
Dobrilla, G ;
DePretis, G ;
Familiari, L ;
Giacobbe, G ;
Fratton, A ;
Carone, N ;
Loriga, P ;
Muscas, A ;
Mazzeo, F ;
Gaeta, L ;
Miglioli, M ;
Pezzilli, R ;
Morelli, A ;
Santucci, L ;
Naccarato, R ;
DelFavero, G ;
Orlandi, F ;
Macarri, GP ;
Russo, A ;
Virgilio, C ;
Uomo, G ;
Manes, G .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (13) :919-923
[4]   Nafamostat mesylate in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis and risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis [J].
Choi, Cheol Woong ;
Kang, Dae Hwan ;
Kim, Gwang Ha ;
Eum, Jae Sup ;
Lee, Sun Mi ;
Song, Geun Am ;
Kim, Dong Uk ;
Kim, Il Doo ;
Cho, Mong .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 69 (04) :E11-E18
[5]   ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY COMPLICATIONS AND THEIR MANAGEMENT - AN ATTEMPT AT CONSENSUS [J].
COTTON, PB ;
LEHMAN, G ;
VENNES, J ;
GEENEN, JE ;
RUSSELL, RCG ;
MEYERS, WC ;
LIGUORY, C ;
NICKL, N .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1991, 37 (03) :383-393
[6]  
Francisco M, 2013, REV ESP ENFERM DIG, V105, P84, DOI 10.4321/s1130-01082013000200005
[7]   Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy [J].
Freeman, ML ;
Nelson, DB ;
Sherman, S ;
Haber, GB ;
Herman, ME ;
Dorsher, PJ ;
Moore, JP ;
Fennerty, MB ;
Ryan, ME ;
Shaw, MJ ;
Lande, JD ;
Pheley, AM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (13) :909-918
[8]   Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a comprehensive review [J].
Freeman, ML ;
Guda, NM .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 59 (07) :845-864
[9]   PHARMACOLOGICAL STUDIES OF FUT-175, NAFAMOSTAT MESILATE .5. EFFECTS ON THE PANCREATIC-ENZYMES AND EXPERIMENTAL ACUTE-PANCREATITIS IN RATS [J].
IWAKI, M ;
INO, Y ;
MOTOYOSHI, A ;
OZEKI, M ;
SATO, T ;
KURUMI, M ;
AOYAMA, T .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1986, 41 (02) :155-162
[10]   Regional effects of nafamostat, a novel potent protease and complement inhibitor, on severe necrotizing pancreatitis [J].
Keck, T ;
Balcom, JH ;
Antoniu, BA ;
Lewandrowski, K ;
Warshaw, AL ;
Fernández-del Castillo, C .
SURGERY, 2001, 130 (02) :175-181