The role of motivated science reception and numeracy in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic

被引:20
作者
Hutmacher, Fabian [1 ]
Reichardt, Regina [3 ]
Appel, Markus [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wurzburg, Human Comp Media Inst, Oswald Kulpe Weg 82, D-97074 Wurzburg, Germany
[2] Univ Wurzburg, Psychol Commun & New Media, Wurzburg, Germany
[3] Univ Regensburg, Dept Psychol, Regensburg, Germany
关键词
COVID-19; pandemic; motivated reasoning; motivated science reception; numeracy; ATTITUDE; LITERACY; COMPREHENSION; POLARIZATION; INDIVIDUALS; REJECTION; SELECTION; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1177/09636625211047974
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
The successful management of the COVID-19 pandemic depends on individuals accepting the current state of research and adhering to the preventive behaviors that follow from it. However, the processing of scientific results is not always rational, but influenced by prior attitudes as well as the ability to understand statistical data. Against this background, this study investigated the role of motivated reasoning and numeracy in the context of the current pandemic. To this end, participants (N = 417; US sample) evaluated two fictitious studies, one indicating that mask mandates in schools are an effective intervention to contain the spread of SARS-CoV-2, and one indicating that mask mandates in schools are counterproductive. Participants evaluated the studies in line with their prior attitude toward mask mandates. In addition, higher numeracy was associated with decreased bias, demonstrating that the ability to reason with numbers can lead to more accurate processing of statistical information.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 34
页数:16
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Adam D, 2020, NATURE, V583, P346, DOI 10.1038/d41586-020-02009-w
[2]   Linking numeracy and asthma-related quality of life [J].
Apter, Andrea J. ;
Wang, Xingmei ;
Bogen, Daniel ;
Bennett, Ian M. ;
Jennings, Rebecca M. ;
Garcia, Laura ;
Sharpe, Tamie ;
Frazier, Carmen ;
Ten Have, Thomas .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2009, 75 (03) :386-391
[3]   False Equivalence: Are Liberals and Conservatives in the United States Equally Biased? [J].
Baron, Jonathan ;
Jost, John T. .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 14 (02) :292-303
[4]   How Moral Threat Shapes Laypersons' Engagement With Science [J].
Bender, Jens ;
Rothmund, Tobias ;
Nauroth, Peter ;
Gollwitzer, Mario .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2016, 42 (12) :1723-1735
[5]   Belief in COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories Reduces Social Distancing over Time [J].
Bierwiaczonek, Kinga ;
Kunst, Jonas R. ;
Pich, Olivia .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-HEALTH AND WELL BEING, 2020, 12 (04) :1270-1285
[6]   Motivated numeracy and active reasoning in a Western European sample [J].
Connor, Paul ;
Sullivan, Emily ;
Alfano, Mark ;
Tintarev, Nava .
BEHAVIOURAL PUBLIC POLICY, 2024, 8 (01) :24-46
[7]   Predictors of pessimistic breast cancer risk perceptions in a primary care population [J].
Davids, SL ;
Schapira, MM ;
McAuliffe, TL ;
Nattinger, AB .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 19 (04) :310-315
[8]   Motivated reasoning and performance on the Wason selection task [J].
Dawson, E ;
Gilovich, T ;
Regan, DT .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2002, 28 (10) :1379-1387
[9]   At Least Bias Is Bipartisan: A Meta-Analytic Comparison of Partisan Bias in Liberals and Conservatives [J].
Ditto, Peter H. ;
Liu, Brittany S. ;
Clark, Cory J. ;
Wojcik, Sean P. ;
Chen, Eric E. ;
Grady, Rebecca H. ;
Celniker, Jared B. ;
Zinger, Joanne F. .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 14 (02) :273-291
[10]   Affective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America [J].
Druckman, James N. ;
Klar, Samara ;
Krupnikov, Yanna ;
Levendusky, Matthew ;
Ryan, John Barry .
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2021, 5 (01) :28-38