Populist discourses in the Hungarian public sphere From right to left (and Beyond)?

被引:8
作者
Barat, Erzsebet [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Szeged, Dept English Studies, Egyet U 2, H-6722 Szeged, Hungary
关键词
right-wing populism; left-wing populism; alternative left-wing populism; Two-Tailed Dog Party; Hungarian Government; empty signifier; vulneribility; non-exclusionary identity; irony;
D O I
10.1075/jlp.17026.bar
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Extending Laclau's (2005) claim to the importance of `'populism' for a democratic politics, I argue that the 'we', when issued from a left-wing position around 'empty signifiers', must be informed by an inclusionary logic. In my critical study of the Hungarian Government's right-wing populist discourses, I show that their billboard campaign in 2016 against the European Union's migrant quota articulates the ` we are not like them' exclusionary distinction of ` against and over'. Through Judith Butler's category of vulnerability and Mary Matsuda's relative distinction between immediate and indirect targets of exclusion, I explore the inclusionary logic of the campaign by the Two-Tailed Dog Party. I demonstrate that a non-identitarian collective subject "from below" in their alternative left-wing populism is made possible by the power of irony that may sidestep the mobilising force of fear that should legitimise the Government's agenda.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 550
页数:16
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Barat Erzsebet, 2012, TRANSPORT QUEER THEO, P81
[2]  
Barat Erzsebet, 1996, FRAMING ISSUES BRIT, P125
[3]  
Butler J., 2004, PRECARIOUS LIFE
[4]  
Butler J., 2015, Notes toward a performative theory of assembly, DOI DOI 10.4159/9780674495548
[5]  
Chiantrea-Stutte Patricia, 2003, COMP LIT CULTURE, V5, P417
[6]   Hegemonic masculinity - Rethinking the concept [J].
Connell, RW ;
Messerschmidt, JW .
GENDER & SOCIETY, 2005, 19 (06) :829-859
[7]  
Hutchings S., 2015, NATION ETHNICITY RAC
[8]  
Laclau E., 2005, On populist reason
[9]  
Laclau Ernesto, 1996, Emancipation(s)
[10]  
Matsuda M. J., 1993, Words that wound: Critical race theory, assaultive speech, and the First Amendment