Development of Risk Assessment Framework for First Time Offenders Using Ensemble Learning

被引:8
作者
Singh, Aman [1 ]
Mohapatra, Subrajeet [1 ]
机构
[1] Birla Inst Technol Mesra BIT Mesra, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Ranchi 835215, Bihar, India
关键词
Risk management; Predictive models; Machine learning; Computational modeling; Psychology; Tools; Support vector machines; Recidivism; first time offenders; predicting criminal recidivism; quantitative psychology; ensemble learning model; NEURAL-NETWORK MODELS; PREDICTION; CLASSIFICATION; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3116205
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Recidivism is generally considered as a deficiency disease in which offenders recommend a crime or repeat an offence. Empirically committing the first crime at a very young age leads to a much higher rebound rate and the continuation of similar offensive behavior. Accordingly, prioritization must be given for the early assessment of recidivism behavior in first-time offender by law enforcing agencies. Different prison studies suggest that recidivism can be curtailed by early behavioral risk assessment in first-time offenders. Ideally, a psychologist conducts a manual risk assessment using standard psychological assessment tools, which has long been regarded as a standard method for recidivism risk assessment. However, such behavioral examination procedures are usually sluggish and constrained by subjective perceptions. Consequently, this study aims to develop a machine learning-based quantitative risk assessment tool for the recidivism behavioral gradation of first-time offenders. Quantitative gradation and prediction of future recidivism behavior in such offenders are achieved using an ensemble learning model and an advanced machine-learning approach. For the available behavioral data collected from multiple prison locations, simulations were performed, and the experimental results were obtained. It is ascertained that, the proposed three-member and five-member ensemble classifier models lead to 85.47% and 87.72% accuracy respectively in comparison to other standard individual classifiers.
引用
收藏
页码:135024 / 135033
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Acharya T, 2005, IMAGE PROCESSING: PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS, P1, DOI 10.1002/0471745790
[2]  
Agrawal M., 2019, USING MACHINE LEARNI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, CRIMINAL JUSTICE POL, DOI DOI 10.1177/0887403415604899
[4]  
Berk R.A., 2013, Security Informatics, V2, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1186/2190-8532-2-5, 10.1186/2190-8532-2-5]
[5]   An impact assessment of machine learning risk forecasts on parole board decisions and recidivism [J].
Berk, Richard .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CRIMINOLOGY, 2017, 13 (02) :193-216
[6]   On the relation between cognitive and biological modelling of criminal behaviour [J].
Bosse, Tibor ;
Gerritsen, Charlotte ;
Treur, Jan .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2011, 27 (05) :1593-1611
[7]  
Brown G, 2010, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V5997, P124, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-12127-2_13
[8]  
Buchanan A., 2015, FOCUS, V13, P490
[9]  
CarolineWang Bin Han, 2020, ARXIV200504176
[10]   Spatio-temporal crime predictions in smart cities: A data-driven approach and experiments [J].
Catlett, Charlie ;
Cesario, Eugenio ;
Talia, Domenico ;
Vinci, Andrea .
PERVASIVE AND MOBILE COMPUTING, 2019, 53 :62-74