Innovation policy analysis and learning: Comparing Ireland and Taiwan

被引:10
作者
Lin, Grace Tyng-Ruu [1 ]
Chang, Yo-Hsing [1 ]
Shen, Yung-Chi [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Chiao Tung Univ, Inst Technol Management, Hsinchu, Taiwan
关键词
national innovation policy; country studies; Taiwan; Ireland; RECENT TRENDS; EMERGENCE; GOVERNMENT; NETWORKS; INDUSTRY; ECONOMY; SYSTEMS; ASIA;
D O I
10.1080/08985626.2010.483290
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Taiwan and Ireland are regarded as being similar in their geographic positions and economic performances. Both countries moved from being agricultural economies to become major regional players, and are often pointed to as examples of positive national development and innovation. The main purpose of this article is to compare the two island countries' innovation policies in a national context. The taxonomy of innovation policy proposed by Rothwell and Zegveld [1981, Industrial innovation and public policy. London: Frances Printer Ltd.] was adopted as the analysis framework for this study. The comparison shows that Taiwan's government employs more top-down policy instruments such as providing government research funding and resources to target industries. The Irish government successfully creates an innovation-friendly environment to attract foreign direct investment (FDI) to facilitate research and development at the firm level. Finally, this article provides policy implications and recommendations based on what was learned from the comparison of the two countries.
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 762
页数:32
相关论文
共 108 条
[1]  
*ADV SCI COUNC, 2006, STRAT SCI TECHN INN
[2]  
Andreosso-O'Callaghan B., 2000, ENTREP REGION DEV, V12, P69
[3]  
[Anonymous], OECD FACTB 2007 EC E
[4]  
[Anonymous], WORLD FACTB
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, SCI TECHN YB
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2016, BRING FDN GOV CLOS C
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1973, IND TAIWAN 1946 1972
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1994, NBER Working Paper No. 4964
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1995, INNOVATION E ASIA CH
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1983, NAT PROGR SCI TECHN