Information transparency: Examining physicians' perspectives toward online consumer reviews in the United States

被引:6
作者
Kemp, Elyria [1 ]
Porter, McDowell, III [2 ]
Albert, Christine [3 ]
Min, Kyeong Sam [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Orleans, Coll Business Adm, 2000 Lakeshore Dr, New Orleans, LA 70148 USA
[2] Calif State Univ Fresno, Craig Sch Business, Fresno, CA 93740 USA
[3] LCMC Hlth, New Orleans, LA USA
关键词
Transparency; online reviews; physicians; protection motivation theory; HEALTH LITERACY; MODERATING ROLE; EXPERIENCE; ENGAGEMENT; RISK; CARE; METAANALYSIS; INTENTION; ATTITUDE; TRUST;
D O I
10.1080/20479700.2020.1728925
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
A number of U.S. healthcare organizations are taking steps to implement online review programs for physicians. However, physicians may harbor concerns about being evaluated by their patients. This research investigates both the attitudes and concerns of physicians regarding a star rating system that was implemented in an actual healthcare system in the United States. A survey regarding the implementation of a rating system was sent to physicians at a major nonprofit healthcare system. Findings demonstrate that physicians express risk perceptions about patient rating systems, which in turn influence their attitude toward the rating system, rendering them reticent about adopting such a system. Results also suggest that level of involvement, trust of the rating system, and organizational support are negatively related to physicians' risk perceptions toward the online rating system, whereas organizational support and physician engagement are positively related to transparency. Thus, this research submits that increasing physician level of involvement in transparency initiatives, inculcating trust in online review systems, and consistently offering organizational support might help to foster physician adoption of online review systems.
引用
收藏
页码:1050 / 1056
页数:7
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Alton L., 2017, TRANSPARENCY BECAME
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, ONLINE CUSTOMER REV
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, PHYS LEADERSH J, V1, P77
[4]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[5]  
Binary Fountain, 2018, HEALTHC CONS INS DIG
[6]   Detailed insights into the influence of flood-coping appraisals on mitigation behaviour [J].
Bubeck, P. ;
Botzen, W. J. W. ;
Kreibich, H. ;
Aerts, J. C. J. H. .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2013, 23 (05) :1327-1338
[7]  
Burke K., 2017, GET MORE 5 STAR ONLI
[8]  
Butcher L., 2017, NEUROL TODAY, V17, P26, DOI [10.1097/01.NT.0000529651.42074.e0, DOI 10.1097/01.NT.0000529651.42074.E0]
[9]   The Use of Recommendations on Physician Rating Websites: The Number of Raters Makes the Difference When Adjusting Decisions [J].
Carbonell, Guillermo ;
Meshi, Dar ;
Brand, Matthias .
HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2019, 34 (13) :1653-1662
[10]  
Castaneda R., 2018, RATING DOCTORS WHAT