Variability in clinical diagnoses during the ICD-8 and ICD-10 era

被引:16
作者
Nordgaard, Julie [1 ]
Jessen, Kasper [2 ,3 ]
Saebye, Ditte [4 ]
Parnas, Josef [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Early Psychosis Intervent Ctr, Reg Zealand, Smedegade 16, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Ctr Clin Intervent & Neuropsychiat Schizophrenia, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Ctr Neuropsychiat Schizophrenia Res, Mental Hlth Ctr Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg Hosp, Capital Reg, Inst Prevent Med, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Univ Copenhagen, Ctr Subject Res, Copenhagen, Denmark
[6] Univ Copenhagen, Mental Hlth Ctr Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Diagnosis; ICD-8; ICD-10; Uniformity; Clinical; DSM-III-R; FIELD TRIAL; BEHAVIORAL-DISORDERS; MENTAL-DISORDERS; SCHIZOPHRENIA; CLASSIFICATION; RELIABILITY; EXPERIENCE; PSYCHIATRY; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1007/s00127-016-1265-9
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
To explore whether the diagnostic homogeneity in a daily, routine clinical activity changed visibly over two historical periods (the ICD-8 and the ICD-10 era) across and within five psychiatric in-patient clinics. In this register study, we analyzed the discharge diagnoses from five university-affiliated departments of psychiatry in Denmark in two time periods: 1980-1985 (ICD-8) and 2001-2010 (ICD-10). The synchronic inter-departmental diagnostic differences did not decrease in the ICD-10 era compared with ICD-8 era. Nor did the diachronic stability within each department become more homogeneous. The diagnostic variability reflected by the diagnostic differences between the departments and by the diagnostic homogeneity within each department remained similar in the two historical periods with no evidence of an increased homogeneity of diagnostic habits after the introduction of the ICD-10. There is a myriad of variables that affects the diagnostic variability over time that we were not able to control.
引用
收藏
页码:1293 / 1299
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Demazeux S, 2015, HIST PHIL THEOR LIFE, V10, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-9765-8
  • [2] Psychiatric Diagnosis: Lessons from the DSM-IV Past and Cautions for the DSM-5 Future
    Frances, Allen J.
    Widiger, Thomas
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 8, 2012, 8 : 109 - 130
  • [3] Handest P, 2003, SUBJEKTIV EKSPRESSIV
  • [4] TESTING THE COMPARABILITY OF PSYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSES IN ICD-10 AND DSM-III-R
    HILLER, W
    DICHTL, G
    HECHT, H
    HUNDT, W
    VONZERSSEN, D
    [J]. PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, 1994, 27 (1-2) : 19 - 28
  • [5] Hyman Steven E, 2011, Cerebrum, V2011, P6
  • [6] The Diagnosis of Mental Disorders: The Problem of Reification
    Hyman, Steven E.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 6, 2010, 6 : 155 - 179
  • [7] Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): Toward a New Classification Framework for Research on Mental Disorders
    Insel, Thomas
    Cuthbert, Bruce
    Garvey, Marjorie
    Heinssen, Robert
    Pine, Daniel S.
    Quinn, Kevin
    Sanislow, Charles
    Wang, Philip
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 167 (07) : 748 - 751
  • [8] THE COPENHAGEN HIGH-RISK PROJECT - THE DIAGNOSIS OF MATERNAL SCHIZOPHRENIA AND ITS RELATION TO OFFSPRING DIAGNOSIS
    JORGENSEN, A
    TEASDALE, TW
    PARNAS, J
    SCHULSINGER, F
    SCHULSINGER, H
    MEDNICK, SA
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1987, 151 : 753 - 757
  • [9] Kendler K.S., 2012, Philosophical issues in psychiatry. II
  • [10] Kendler K.S., 2015, Philosophical issues in psychiatry: Explanation, phenomenology, and nosology, DOI DOI 10.1093/MED/9780198725978.001.0001