Artificial Intelligence and Surgical Decision-making

被引:250
作者
Loftus, Tyler J. [1 ]
Tighe, Patrick J. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Filiberto, Amanda C. [1 ]
Efron, Philip A. [1 ]
Brakenridge, Scott C. [1 ]
Mohr, Alicia M. [1 ]
Rashidi, Parisa [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Upchurch, Gilbert R., Jr. [1 ]
Bihorac, Azra [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida Hlth, Dept Surg, Gainesville, FL USA
[2] Univ Florida Hlth, Dept Anesthesiol, Gainesville, FL USA
[3] Univ Florida Hlth, Dept Orthoped, Gainesville, FL USA
[4] Univ Florida Hlth, Dept Informat Syst Operat Management, Gainesville, FL USA
[5] Univ Florida, Dept Biomed Engn, Gainesville, FL USA
[6] Univ Florida, Dept Comp & Informat Sci & Engn, Gainesville, FL USA
[7] Univ Florida, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Gainesville, FL USA
[8] Univ Florida Hlth, Dept Med, Gainesville, FL USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
C-REACTIVE PROTEIN; MORTALITY PREDICTION; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; HEALTH; RISK; MEDICINE; SCORE;
D O I
10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4917
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
This review describes the weaknesses of traditional clinical decision-support systems and proposes that artificial intelligence should be used to augment surgical decision-making. Importance Surgeons make complex, high-stakes decisions under time constraints and uncertainty, with significant effect on patient outcomes. This review describes the weaknesses of traditional clinical decision-support systems and proposes that artificial intelligence should be used to augment surgical decision-making. Observations Surgical decision-making is dominated by hypothetical-deductive reasoning, individual judgment, and heuristics. These factors can lead to bias, error, and preventable harm. Traditional predictive analytics and clinical decision-support systems are intended to augment surgical decision-making, but their clinical utility is compromised by time-consuming manual data management and suboptimal accuracy. These challenges can be overcome by automated artificial intelligence models fed by livestreaming electronic health record data with mobile device outputs. This approach would require data standardization, advances in model interpretability, careful implementation and monitoring, attention to ethical challenges involving algorithm bias and accountability for errors, and preservation of bedside assessment and human intuition in the decision-making process. Conclusions and Relevance Integration of artificial intelligence with surgical decision-making has the potential to transform care by augmenting the decision to operate, informed consent process, identification and mitigation of modifiable risk factors, decisions regarding postoperative management, and shared decisions regarding resource use.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 158
页数:11
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [71] Clinicians' gut feeling about serious infections in children: observational study
    Van den Bruel, Ann
    Thompson, Matthew
    Buntinx, Frank
    Mant, David
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 345
  • [72] Diagnostic value of clinical features at presentation to identify serious infection in children in developed countries: a systematic review
    Van den Bruel, Ann
    Haj-Hassan, Tanya
    Thompson, Matthew
    Buntinx, Frank
    Mant, David
    [J]. LANCET, 2010, 375 (9717) : 834 - 845
  • [73] van der Maaten L, 2008, J MACH LEARN RES, V9, P2579
  • [74] The SOFA (sepsis-related organ failure assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure
    Vincent, JL
    Moreno, R
    Takala, J
    Willatts, S
    DeMendonca, A
    Bruining, H
    Reinhart, CK
    Suter, PM
    Thijs, LG
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1996, 22 (07) : 707 - 710
  • [75] Making choices impairs subsequent self-control: A limited-resource account of decision making, self-regulation, and active initiative
    Vohs, Kathleen D.
    Schmeichel, Brandon J.
    Nelson, Noelle M.
    Baumeister, Roy F.
    Twenge, Jean M.
    Tice, Dianne M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 94 (05) : 883 - 898