Artificial Intelligence and Surgical Decision-making

被引:250
作者
Loftus, Tyler J. [1 ]
Tighe, Patrick J. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Filiberto, Amanda C. [1 ]
Efron, Philip A. [1 ]
Brakenridge, Scott C. [1 ]
Mohr, Alicia M. [1 ]
Rashidi, Parisa [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Upchurch, Gilbert R., Jr. [1 ]
Bihorac, Azra [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida Hlth, Dept Surg, Gainesville, FL USA
[2] Univ Florida Hlth, Dept Anesthesiol, Gainesville, FL USA
[3] Univ Florida Hlth, Dept Orthoped, Gainesville, FL USA
[4] Univ Florida Hlth, Dept Informat Syst Operat Management, Gainesville, FL USA
[5] Univ Florida, Dept Biomed Engn, Gainesville, FL USA
[6] Univ Florida, Dept Comp & Informat Sci & Engn, Gainesville, FL USA
[7] Univ Florida, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Gainesville, FL USA
[8] Univ Florida Hlth, Dept Med, Gainesville, FL USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
C-REACTIVE PROTEIN; MORTALITY PREDICTION; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; HEALTH; RISK; MEDICINE; SCORE;
D O I
10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4917
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
This review describes the weaknesses of traditional clinical decision-support systems and proposes that artificial intelligence should be used to augment surgical decision-making. Importance Surgeons make complex, high-stakes decisions under time constraints and uncertainty, with significant effect on patient outcomes. This review describes the weaknesses of traditional clinical decision-support systems and proposes that artificial intelligence should be used to augment surgical decision-making. Observations Surgical decision-making is dominated by hypothetical-deductive reasoning, individual judgment, and heuristics. These factors can lead to bias, error, and preventable harm. Traditional predictive analytics and clinical decision-support systems are intended to augment surgical decision-making, but their clinical utility is compromised by time-consuming manual data management and suboptimal accuracy. These challenges can be overcome by automated artificial intelligence models fed by livestreaming electronic health record data with mobile device outputs. This approach would require data standardization, advances in model interpretability, careful implementation and monitoring, attention to ethical challenges involving algorithm bias and accountability for errors, and preservation of bedside assessment and human intuition in the decision-making process. Conclusions and Relevance Integration of artificial intelligence with surgical decision-making has the potential to transform care by augmenting the decision to operate, informed consent process, identification and mitigation of modifiable risk factors, decisions regarding postoperative management, and shared decisions regarding resource use.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 158
页数:11
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [1] Improved predictive models for acute kidney injury with IDEA: Intraoperative Data Embedded Analytics
    Adhikari, Lasith
    Ozrazgat-Baslanti, Tezcan
    Ruppert, Matthew
    Madushani, R. W. M. A.
    Paliwal, Srajan
    Hashemighouchani, Haleh
    Zheng, Feng
    Tao, Ming
    Lopes, Juliano M.
    Li, Xiaolin
    Rashidi, Parisa
    Bihorac, Azra
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (04):
  • [2] Electronic health record adoption in US hospitals: the emergence of a digital "advanced use" divide
    Adler-Milstein, Julia
    Holmgren, A. Jay
    Kralovec, Peter
    Worzala, Chantal
    Searcy, Talisha
    Patel, Vaishali
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2017, 24 (06) : 1142 - 1148
  • [3] Angwin J., 2016, Machine Bias
  • [4] Data Omission by Physician Trainees on ICU Rounds
    Artis, Kathryn A.
    Bordley, James
    Mohan, Vishnu
    Gold, Jeffrey A.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (03) : 403 - 409
  • [5] Perioperative risk prediction in the era of enhanced recovery: a comparison of POSSUM, ACPGBI, and E-PASS scoring systems in major surgical procedures of the colorectal surgeon
    Bagnall, Nigel M.
    Pring, Edward T.
    Malietzis, George
    Athanasiou, Thanos
    Faiz, Omar D.
    Kennedy, Robin H.
    Jenkins, John T.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2018, 33 (11) : 1627 - 1634
  • [6] Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy
    Bechara, A
    Damasio, H
    Tranel, D
    Damasio, AR
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1997, 275 (5304) : 1293 - 1295
  • [7] Disagreement Between Clinicians and Score in Decision-Making Capacity of Critically Ill Patients*
    Bertrand, Pierre-Marie
    Pereira, Bruno
    Adda, Mireille
    Timsit, Jean-Francois
    Wolff, Michel
    Hilbert, Gilles
    Gruson, Didier
    Garrouste-Orgeas, Maite
    Argaud, Laurent
    Constantin, Jean-Michel
    Chabanne, Russel
    Quenot, Jean-Pierre
    Bohe, Julien
    Guerin, Claude
    Papazian, Laurent
    Jonquet, Olivier
    Klouche, Kada
    Delahaye, Arnaud
    Riu, Beatrice
    Zieleskiewicz, Laurent
    Darmon, Michael
    Azoulay, Elie
    Souweine, Bertrand
    Lautrette, Alexandre
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (03) : 337 - 344
  • [8] Surgical Risk Is Not Linear: Derivation and Validation of a Novel, User-friendly, and Machine-learning-based Predictive OpTimal Trees in Emergency Surgery Risk (POTTER) Calculator
    Bertsimas, Dimitris
    Dunn, Jack
    Velmahos, George C.
    Kaafarani, Haytham M. A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2018, 268 (04) : 574 - 583
  • [9] MySurgeryRisk: Development and Validation of a Machine-learning Risk Algorithm for Major Complications and Death After Surgery
    Bihorac, Azra
    Ozrazgat-Baslanti, Tezcan
    Ebadi, Ashkan
    Motaei, Amir
    Madkour, Mohcine
    Pardalos, Panagote M.
    Lipori, Gloria
    Hogan, William R.
    Efron, Philip A.
    Moore, Frederick
    Moldawer, Lyle L.
    Wang, Daisy Zhe
    Hobson, Charles E.
    Rashidi, Parisi
    Li, Xiaolin
    Momcilovic, Petar
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2019, 269 (04) : 652 - 662
  • [10] Uses of Electronic Health Records for Public Health Surveillance to Advance Public Health
    Birkhead, Guthrie S.
    Klompas, Michael
    Shah, Nirav R.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, VOL 36, 2015, 36 : 345 - 359