Artificial Intelligence and Surgical Decision-making

被引:292
作者
Loftus, Tyler J. [1 ]
Tighe, Patrick J. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Filiberto, Amanda C. [1 ]
Efron, Philip A. [1 ]
Brakenridge, Scott C. [1 ]
Mohr, Alicia M. [1 ]
Rashidi, Parisa [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Upchurch, Gilbert R., Jr. [1 ]
Bihorac, Azra [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida Hlth, Dept Surg, Gainesville, FL USA
[2] Univ Florida Hlth, Dept Anesthesiol, Gainesville, FL USA
[3] Univ Florida Hlth, Dept Orthoped, Gainesville, FL USA
[4] Univ Florida Hlth, Dept Informat Syst Operat Management, Gainesville, FL USA
[5] Univ Florida, Dept Biomed Engn, Gainesville, FL USA
[6] Univ Florida, Dept Comp & Informat Sci & Engn, Gainesville, FL USA
[7] Univ Florida, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Gainesville, FL USA
[8] Univ Florida Hlth, Dept Med, Gainesville, FL USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
C-REACTIVE PROTEIN; MORTALITY PREDICTION; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; HEALTH; RISK; MEDICINE; SCORE;
D O I
10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4917
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
This review describes the weaknesses of traditional clinical decision-support systems and proposes that artificial intelligence should be used to augment surgical decision-making. Importance Surgeons make complex, high-stakes decisions under time constraints and uncertainty, with significant effect on patient outcomes. This review describes the weaknesses of traditional clinical decision-support systems and proposes that artificial intelligence should be used to augment surgical decision-making. Observations Surgical decision-making is dominated by hypothetical-deductive reasoning, individual judgment, and heuristics. These factors can lead to bias, error, and preventable harm. Traditional predictive analytics and clinical decision-support systems are intended to augment surgical decision-making, but their clinical utility is compromised by time-consuming manual data management and suboptimal accuracy. These challenges can be overcome by automated artificial intelligence models fed by livestreaming electronic health record data with mobile device outputs. This approach would require data standardization, advances in model interpretability, careful implementation and monitoring, attention to ethical challenges involving algorithm bias and accountability for errors, and preservation of bedside assessment and human intuition in the decision-making process. Conclusions and Relevance Integration of artificial intelligence with surgical decision-making has the potential to transform care by augmenting the decision to operate, informed consent process, identification and mitigation of modifiable risk factors, decisions regarding postoperative management, and shared decisions regarding resource use.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 158
页数:11
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Improved predictive models for acute kidney injury with IDEA: Intraoperative Data Embedded Analytics [J].
Adhikari, Lasith ;
Ozrazgat-Baslanti, Tezcan ;
Ruppert, Matthew ;
Madushani, R. W. M. A. ;
Paliwal, Srajan ;
Hashemighouchani, Haleh ;
Zheng, Feng ;
Tao, Ming ;
Lopes, Juliano M. ;
Li, Xiaolin ;
Rashidi, Parisa ;
Bihorac, Azra .
PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (04)
[2]   Electronic health record adoption in US hospitals: the emergence of a digital "advanced use" divide [J].
Adler-Milstein, Julia ;
Holmgren, A. Jay ;
Kralovec, Peter ;
Worzala, Chantal ;
Searcy, Talisha ;
Patel, Vaishali .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2017, 24 (06) :1142-1148
[3]  
Angwin J., 2016, PROPUBLICA
[4]   Data Omission by Physician Trainees on ICU Rounds [J].
Artis, Kathryn A. ;
Bordley, James ;
Mohan, Vishnu ;
Gold, Jeffrey A. .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (03) :403-409
[5]   Perioperative risk prediction in the era of enhanced recovery: a comparison of POSSUM, ACPGBI, and E-PASS scoring systems in major surgical procedures of the colorectal surgeon [J].
Bagnall, Nigel M. ;
Pring, Edward T. ;
Malietzis, George ;
Athanasiou, Thanos ;
Faiz, Omar D. ;
Kennedy, Robin H. ;
Jenkins, John T. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2018, 33 (11) :1627-1634
[6]   Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy [J].
Bechara, A ;
Damasio, H ;
Tranel, D ;
Damasio, AR .
SCIENCE, 1997, 275 (5304) :1293-1295
[7]   Disagreement Between Clinicians and Score in Decision-Making Capacity of Critically Ill Patients* [J].
Bertrand, Pierre-Marie ;
Pereira, Bruno ;
Adda, Mireille ;
Timsit, Jean-Francois ;
Wolff, Michel ;
Hilbert, Gilles ;
Gruson, Didier ;
Garrouste-Orgeas, Maite ;
Argaud, Laurent ;
Constantin, Jean-Michel ;
Chabanne, Russel ;
Quenot, Jean-Pierre ;
Bohe, Julien ;
Guerin, Claude ;
Papazian, Laurent ;
Jonquet, Olivier ;
Klouche, Kada ;
Delahaye, Arnaud ;
Riu, Beatrice ;
Zieleskiewicz, Laurent ;
Darmon, Michael ;
Azoulay, Elie ;
Souweine, Bertrand ;
Lautrette, Alexandre .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (03) :337-344
[8]   Surgical Risk Is Not Linear: Derivation and Validation of a Novel, User-friendly, and Machine-learning-based Predictive OpTimal Trees in Emergency Surgery Risk (POTTER) Calculator [J].
Bertsimas, Dimitris ;
Dunn, Jack ;
Velmahos, George C. ;
Kaafarani, Haytham M. A. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2018, 268 (04) :574-583
[9]   MySurgeryRisk: Development and Validation of a Machine-learning Risk Algorithm for Major Complications and Death After Surgery [J].
Bihorac, Azra ;
Ozrazgat-Baslanti, Tezcan ;
Ebadi, Ashkan ;
Motaei, Amir ;
Madkour, Mohcine ;
Pardalos, Panagote M. ;
Lipori, Gloria ;
Hogan, William R. ;
Efron, Philip A. ;
Moore, Frederick ;
Moldawer, Lyle L. ;
Wang, Daisy Zhe ;
Hobson, Charles E. ;
Rashidi, Parisi ;
Li, Xiaolin ;
Momcilovic, Petar .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2019, 269 (04) :652-662
[10]   Uses of Electronic Health Records for Public Health Surveillance to Advance Public Health [J].
Birkhead, Guthrie S. ;
Klompas, Michael ;
Shah, Nirav R. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, VOL 36, 2015, 36 :345-359