Groin sentinel node biopsy and 18F-FDG PET/CT-supported preoperative lymph node assessment in cN0 patients with vulvar cancer currently unfit for minimally invasive inguinal surgery: The GroSNaPET study

被引:51
作者
Garganese, G. [1 ]
Collarino, A. [2 ]
Fragomeni, S. M. [1 ]
Rufini, V. [2 ]
Perotti, G. [2 ]
Gentileschi, S. [3 ]
Evangelista, M. T. [1 ]
Ieria, F. P. [2 ]
Zagaria, L. [2 ]
Bove, S. [1 ]
Giordano, A. [2 ]
Scambia, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Inst Nucl Med, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, I-00168 Rome, Italy
来源
EJSO | 2017年 / 43卷 / 09期
关键词
Vulvar cancer; Inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy; Sentinel node biopsy; F-18-FDG PET/CT; Guidelines; Preoperative imaging; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; BREAST-CANCER; RADICAL VULVECTOMY; MANAGEMENT; METASTASIS; MELANOMA; EXCISION; LYMPHADENECTOMY; LOCALIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2017.06.018
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: The study aims were: 1) to verify the role of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in a subset of patients with clinical N0 (cN0) invasive vulvar cancer (VC) who were still candidates for radical inguinal surgery according to the current guidelines; 2) to investigate whether a preoperative F-18-FDG PET/CT (PET/CT) evaluation could improve the selection of node negative patients. Methods: From July 2013 to July 2016, all patients with VC admitted to our Division were evaluated by standard imaging and clinical exam. Among the patients assessed as cN0 we enrolled those unsuitable for SNB, due to: T > 4 cm, multifocal tumors, complete tumor diagnostic excision, contralateral nodal involvement and local recurrence. A preoperative PET/CT was performed. For each patient surgery included SNB, performed using a combined technique (radiotracer plus blue dye), followed by standard inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy. The reference standard was histopathology. Results: Forty-seven patients entered the study for a total of 73 groins. Histopathology revealed 12 metastatic SNs in 9 groins. No false negative SNs were found (NPV 100%). PET/CT showed a negative predictive value of 93%. Conclusions: Our data suggest that SNB is accurate and safe even in cN0 patients currently excluded from this procedure, providing that a careful preoperative selection is performed. PET/CT allows a reliable assessment of LN status and may be an effective support for the selection of patients who are safe candidates for SNB. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd, BASO similar to The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1776 / 1783
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Agency for healthcare Research and Quality, 2014, NAT GUID CLEAR VULV
  • [2] Imaging of Female Pelvic Malignancies Regarding MRI, CT, and PET/CT Part 2
    Alt, Celine D.
    Brocker, Kerstin A.
    Eichbaum, Michael
    Sohn, Christof
    Arnegger, Florian U.
    Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich
    Hallscheidt, Peter
    [J]. STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2011, 187 (11) : 705 - 714
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, NCI VULVAR CANC GUID
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, NHS VULVAR CANC GUID
  • [5] [Anonymous], GUID DIAGN MAN VULV
  • [6] Balton SC, 1975, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V140, P81
  • [7] PET and PET-CT imaging of gynecological malignancies: present role and future promise
    Basu, Sandip
    Li, Geming
    Alavi, Abass
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2009, 9 (01) : 75 - 96
  • [8] CONSERVATIVE SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT OF SUPERFICIALLY INVASIVE STAGE-I VULVAR CARCINOMA
    BERMAN, ML
    SOPER, JT
    CREASMAN, WT
    OLT, GT
    DISAIA, PJ
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1989, 35 (03) : 352 - 357
  • [9] Booth H, 2001, CANC STAT REGISTRATI
  • [10] THE IMPORTANCE OF THE GROIN NODE STATUS FOR THE SURVIVAL OF T1 AND T2 VULVAR CARCINOMA PATIENTS
    BURGER, MPM
    HOLLEMA, H
    EMANUELS, AG
    KRANS, M
    PRAS, E
    BOUMA, J
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1995, 57 (03) : 327 - 334