The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies

被引:6207
作者
von Elm, Erik
Altman, Douglas G.
Egger, Matthias
Pocock, Stuart J.
Gotzsche, Peter C.
Vandenbroucke, Jan P.
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Inst Social & Prevent Med, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Oxford, Ctr Stat Med, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Bristol, Dept Social Med, Bristol, Avon, England
[4] Univ London, London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, London, England
[5] Nordic Cochrane Ctr, Copenhagen, Denmark
[6] Univ Leiden Hosp, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.2471/BLT.07.045120
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalizability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control and cross-sectional studies. We convened a two-day workshop, in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed Explanation and Elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the web sites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.
引用
收藏
页码:867 / 872
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [21] Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review
    Plint, Amy C.
    Moher, David
    Morrison, Andra
    Schulz, Kenneth
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Hill, Catherine
    Gaboury, Isabelle
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2006, 185 (05) : 263 - 267
  • [22] Issues in the reporting of epidemiological studies: a survey of recent practice
    Pocock, SJ
    Collier, TJ
    Dandreo, KJ
    de Stavola, BL
    Goldman, MB
    Kalish, LA
    Kasten, LE
    McCormack, VA
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 329 (7471): : 883 - 887
  • [23] CONSORT revised - Improving the reporting of randomized trials
    Rennie, D
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (15): : 2006 - 2007
  • [24] Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography
    Sanderson, Simon
    Tatt, Lain D.
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 36 (03) : 666 - 676
  • [25] Suggestions for improving the reporting of clinical research: The role of narrative
    Schriger, DL
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2005, 45 (04) : 437 - 443
  • [26] Quality of reporting of observational longitudinal research
    Tooth, L
    Ware, R
    Bain, C
    Purdie, DM
    Dobson, A
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 161 (03) : 280 - 288
  • [27] VANDENBROUCKE JP, 2007, IN PRESS EPIDEMIOLOG
  • [28] VANDENBROUCKE JP, 2007, IN PRESS ANN INTERN
  • [29] von Elm E, 2007, PLOS MED, V4, P1623, DOI [10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296, 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297]