Self -regulatory learning theory as a lens on how undergraduate and postgraduate learners respond to feedback: A BEME scoping review: BEME Guide No. 66

被引:17
作者
Spooner, Muirne [1 ]
Duane, Catherine [1 ]
Uygur, Jane [1 ]
Smyth, Erica [1 ]
Marron, Brian [1 ]
Murphy, Paul J. [1 ]
Pawlikowska, Teresa [1 ]
机构
[1] RCSI Univ Med & Hlth Sci, Hlth Profess Educ Ctr, 123,St Stephens Green, Dublin 2, Ireland
关键词
Feedback; feedback recipience; feedback receptivity; feedback acceptance; feedback response; WORKPLACE-BASED ASSESSMENT; MULTISOURCE FEEDBACK; MEDICAL-STUDENTS; FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT; HIGHER-EDUCATION; PERCEPTIONS; PERFORMANCE; REFLECTION; ASSESSMENTS; MOTIVATION;
D O I
10.1080/0142159X.2021.1970732
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Introduction Little is known of processes by which feedback affects learners to influence achievement. This review maps what is known of how learners interact with feedback, to better understand how feedback affects learning strategies, and to explore enhancing and inhibiting factors. Methods Pilot searching indicated a wide range of interpretations of feedback and study designs, prompting the use of scoping methodology. Inclusion criteria comprised: (i) learners (undergraduate, postgraduate, continuing education) who regularly receive feedback, and (ii) studies that associated feedback with subsequent learner reaction. The screening was performed independently in duplicate. Data extraction and synthesis occurred via an iterative consensus approach. Self-regulatory learning theory (SRL) was used as the conceptual framework. Results Of 4253 abstracts reviewed, 232 were included in the final synthesis. Understandings of feedback are diverse; a minority adopt recognised definitions. Distinct learner responses to feedback can be categorized as cognitive, behavioural, affective, and contextual with complex, overlapping interactions. Importantly emotional responses are commonplace; factors mediating them are pivotal in learner recipience. Conclusion Feedback benefits learners most when focussed on learner needs, via engagement in bi-directional dialogue. Learner emotions must be supported, with the construction of positive learner-teacher relationships. A developmental agenda is key to learner's acceptance of feedback and enhancing future learning.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 18
页数:16
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] The utility of mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education: A BEME review: BEME Guide No. 59
    Hejri, Sara Mortaz
    Jalili, Mohammad
    Masoomi, Rasoul
    Shirazi, Mandana
    Nedjat, Saharnaz
    Norcini, John
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2020, 42 (02) : 125 - 142
  • [2] Training simulated participants for role portrayal and feedback practices in communication skills training: A BEME scoping review: BEME Guide No. 86
    Doyle, Andrea J.
    Sullivan, Clare
    O'Toole, Michelle
    Tjin, Anna
    Simiceva, Anastasija
    Collins, Naoise
    Murphy, Paul
    Anderson, Michael J.
    Mulhall, Claire
    Condron, Claire
    Nestel, Debra
    MacAulay, Robert
    McNaughton, Nancy
    Coffey, Frank
    Eppich, Walter
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2024, 46 (02) : 162 - 178
  • [3] The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: A Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11
    Buckley, Sharon
    Coleman, Jamie
    Davison, Ian
    Khan, Khalid S.
    Zamora, Javier
    Malick, Sadia
    Morley, David
    Pollard, David
    Ashcroft, Tamasine
    Popovic, Celia
    Sayers, Jayne
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2009, 31 (04) : 340 - 355