A tool to assess sex-gender when selecting health research projects

被引:10
作者
Tomas, Concepcion [1 ]
Yago, Teresa [2 ]
Eguiluz, Mercedes [3 ]
Luisa Samitier, Ma [3 ]
Oliveros, Teresa [4 ]
Palacios, Gemma [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zaragoza, Fac Ciencias Salud, E-50009 Zaragoza, Spain
[2] Ctr Municipal Salud, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Ctr Salud San Pablo, Serv Aragones Salud, Zaragoza, Spain
[4] Ctr Salud Valdefierro, Serv Aragones Salud, Zaragoza, Spain
[5] Hosp Lozano Blesa, Serv Aragones Salud, Zaragoza, Spain
来源
ATENCION PRIMARIA | 2015年 / 47卷 / 04期
关键词
Questionnaire; Sex; Gender; Research; Validity and reliability; INNOVATIONS; MEDICINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.aprim.2014.05.010
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To validate the questionnaire "Gender Perspective in Health Research" (GPIHR) to Sex; assess the inclusion of gender perspective in research projects. Design: Validation study in two stages. Feasibility was analysed in the first, and reliability, Research; internal consistence and validity in the second. Validity and Where: Aragon Institute of Health Science, Aragon, Spain. reliability Participants: GPIHR was applied to 118 research projects funded in national and international competitive tenders from 2003 to 2012. Main measurements: Analysis of inter- and intra-observer reliability with Kappa index and internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha. Content validity analysed through literature review and construct validity with an exploratory factor analysis. Results: Validated GPIHR has 10 questions: 3 in the introduction, 1 for objectives, 3 for methodology and 3 for research purpose. Average time of application was 13 min Inter-observer reliability (Kappa) varied between 0.35 and 0.94 and intra-observer between 0.40 and 0.94. Theoretical construct is supported in the literature. Factor analysis identifies three levels of GP inclusion: "difference by sex", "gender sensitive" and "feminist research" with an internal consistency of 0.64, 0.87 and 0.81, respectively, which explain 74.78% of variance. Conclusions: GPIHR questiorinaire is a valid tool to assess GP and useful for those researchers who would like to include GP in their projects. (C) 2014 Elsevier Espana, S.L.U.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 227
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Putting gender on the agenda [J].
不详 .
NATURE, 2010, 465 (7299) :665-665
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, WHAT DIFF SEX GEND M
[3]   Unemployment and mental health:: Understanding the interactions among gender, family roles, and social class [J].
Artazcoz, L ;
Benach, J ;
Borrell, C ;
Cortès, I .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2004, 94 (01) :82-88
[4]  
Borrell C, 2008, REV ESP SALUD PUBLIC, V82, P245
[5]   Gender relations and health research: a review of current practices [J].
Bottorff, Joan L. ;
Oliffe, John L. ;
Robinson, Carole A. ;
Carey, Joanne .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2011, 10
[6]  
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, GEND SEX HLTH RES GU
[7]  
Cronbach LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297
[8]  
Direccion General de Salud Publica y Sanidad Exterior. Ministerio de Sanidad y Politica Exterior, 2010, AV HAC EQ PROP POL I
[9]   Can the gender perspective be assessed in research projects? [J].
Dolores Arino, M. ;
Tomas, Concepcion ;
Eguiluz, Mercedes ;
Luisa Samitier, M. ;
Oliveros, Teresa ;
Yago, Teresa ;
Palacios, Gema ;
Magallon, Rosa .
GACETA SANITARIA, 2011, 25 (02) :146-150
[10]  
Esteban Mari Luz, 2006, Salud colect., V2, P9