Outcomes of complex robot-assisted extravesical ureteral reimplantation in the pediatric population

被引:39
作者
Arlen, Angela M. [1 ,2 ]
Broderick, Kristin M. [1 ,2 ]
Travers, Curtis [3 ]
Smith, Edwin A. [1 ,2 ]
Elmore, James M. [1 ,2 ]
Kirsch, Andrew J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Healthcare Atlanta, Dept Pediat Urol, 5730 Glenridge Dr, Atlanta, GA 30328 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Sch Med, 5730 Glenridge Dr, Atlanta, GA 30328 USA
[3] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Div Biostat, 2015 Uppergate Dr, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
关键词
Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation (RALUR); Laparoscopy; Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR); Voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG); Complications; VESICOURETERAL REFLUX; ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.11.007
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Introduction and objective While open ureteral reimplantation remains the gold standard for surgical treatment of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), minimally invasive approaches offer potential benefits. This study evaluated the outcomes of children undergoing complex robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation (RALUR) for failed previous anti-reflux surgery, complex anatomy, or ureterovesical junction obstruction (UVJO), and compared them with patients undergoing open extravesical repair. Study design Children undergoing complex RALUR or open extravesical ureteral reimplantation (OUR) were identified. Reimplantation was classified as complex if ureters: 1) had previous anti-reflux surgery, 2) required tapering and/or dismembering, or 3) had associated duplication or diverticulum. Results Seventeen children underwent complex RALUR during a 24-month period, compared with 41 OUR. The mean follow-up was 16.6 +/- 6.5 months. The RALUR children were significantly older (9.3 +/- 3.7 years) than the OUR patients (3.1 +/- 2.7 years; P < 0.001). All RALUR patients were discharged on postoperative day one, while 24.4% of children in the open group required longer hospitalization (mean 1.3 +/- 0.7 days; P = 0.03). Adjusting for age, there was no significant difference in inpatient analgesic usage between the two cohorts. Three OUR patients (7.3%) developed postoperative febrile urinary tract infection compared with a single child (5.9%) undergoing RALUR (P = 1.00). There was no significant difference in complication rate between the two groups (12.2% OUR versus 11.8% RALUR; P = 1.00). A postoperative cystogram was performed in the majority of RALUR patients, with no persistent VUR detected, and one child (6.7%) was diagnosed with contralateral reflux. Discussion Reported VUR resolution rates following robot-assisted ureteral reimplantation are varied. In the present series, children undergoing RALUR following failed previous anti-reflux surgery, with complex anatomy, or UVJO experienced a shorter length of stay but had similar analgesic requirements to those undergoing open repair. Radiographic, clinical success rates and complication risk were comparable. This study had several limitations, aside from lack of randomization. Analgesic use was limited to an inpatient setting, and pain scores were not assessed. Not all children underwent a postoperative VCUG, so the true radiographic success rate is unknown. A larger patient cohort with longer follow-up is necessary to determine predictors of radiographic and clinical failure. Conclusion Older children with a previous history of anti-reflux surgery were more likely to undergo RALUR. These children had success and complication rates comparable to younger patients following complex open extravesical reimplantation, which underscores the expanding role of robot-assisted lower urinary tract reconstructive surgery in the pediatric population.
引用
收藏
页码:169.e1 / 169.e6
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Robot-assisted extravesical ureteral reimplantation: Outcomes and conclusions from 78 ureters
    Akhavan, Ardavan
    Avery, Daniel
    Lendvay, Thomas S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2014, 10 (05) : 864 - 868
  • [2] Temporal Pattern of Vesicoureteral Reflux on Voiding Cystourethrogram Correlates with Dynamic Endoscopic Hydrodistention Grade of Ureteral Orifice
    Arlen, Angela M.
    Broderick, Kristin M.
    Huen, Kathy H.
    Leong, Traci
    Scherz, Hal C.
    Kirsch, Andrew J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (05) : 1503 - 1507
  • [3] Austin JC, 2004, UROL CLIN N AM, V31, P534
  • [4] Nerve sparing robotic extravesical ureteral reimplantation
    Casale, Pasquale
    Patel, Rakesh P.
    Kolon, Thomas F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (05) : 1987 - 1989
  • [5] Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteric reimplantation: extravesical technique
    Dangle, Pankaj P.
    Shah, Anup
    Gundeti, Mohan S.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 114 (04) : 630 - 632
  • [6] DeFoor W, J UROL, V172, P1640
  • [7] Di Lorenzo Nicola, 2005, JSLS, V9, P3
  • [8] British Association of Paediatric Urologists consensus statement on the management of the primary obstructive megaureter
    Farrugia, Marie-Klaire
    Hitchcock, Rowena
    Radford, Anna
    Burki, Tariq
    Robb, Andrew
    Murphy, Feilim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2014, 10 (01) : 26 - 33
  • [9] Robot-assisted Tapered Ureteral Reimplantation for Congenital Megaureter
    Goh, Alvin C.
    Link, Richard E.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2011, 77 (03) : 742 - 745
  • [10] Multi-Institutional Review of Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Extravesical Ureteral Reimplantation
    Grimsby, Gwen M.
    Dwyer, Moira E.
    Jacobs, Micah A.
    Ost, Michael C.
    Schneck, Francis X.
    Cannon, Glenn M.
    Gargollo, Patricio C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (05) : 1791 - 1795