A global sensitivity analysis approach for identifying critical sources of uncertainty in non -identifiable, spatially distributed environmental models: A holistic analysis applied to SWAT for input datasets and model parameters

被引:44
作者
Koo, Hyeongmo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen, Min [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jakeman, Anthony J. [4 ]
Zhang, Fengyuan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Normal Univ, Minist Educ China, Key Lab Virtual Geog Environm, Nanjing 210023, Peoples R China
[2] State Key Lab Cultivat Base Geog Environm Evolut, Nanjing 210023, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangsu Ctr Collaborat Innovat Geog Informat Reso, Nanjing 210023, Peoples R China
[4] Australian Natl Univ, Inst Water Futures, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, Canberra, ACT, Australia
关键词
Uncertainty; Sensitivity analysis; Water quality; SWAT; Watershed delineation; Hydrological response unit; Identifiability; NONPOINT-SOURCE POLLUTION; ERROR PROPAGATION; WATERSHED DELINEATION; ELEVATION DATA; RESOLUTION; RAINFALL; IMPACT; BASIN; GIS; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104676
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Environmental models have a key role to play in understanding complex environmental phenomena in space and time. Although their inherent uncertainty and non-identifiability are being increasingly recognized with the development and application of various methods, a more holistic analysis of all sources of model uncertainty is warranted. This paper addresses sources of uncertainty from various types of input datasets and model parameters, including those related to model structure assumptions, using a Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) application for the Minjiang River watershed, China. The holistic uncertainty sources in the SWAT application are summarized, and a sensitivity analysis (SA) is applied to examine the relative importance of the uncertainty sources influencing average streamflow and the load of nitrate. The analysis reveals that uncertainties related to the stream network precision and certain SWAT parameters are the most critical factors. Furthermore, building upon our SA framework to consider uncertainty sources more holistically would provide a good starting point for subsequent SA of spatially distributed environmental models in general.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 83 条
  • [1] Abbaspour K., 2015, Neprashtechnology.Ca, DOI [10.1007/s00402-009-1032-4, DOI 10.1007/S00402-009-1032-4]
  • [2] Modelling hydrology and water quality in the pre-alpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT
    Abbaspour, Karim C.
    Yang, Jing
    Maximov, Ivan
    Siber, Rosi
    Bogner, Konrad
    Mieleitner, Johanna
    Zobrist, Juerg
    Srinivasan, Raghavan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2007, 333 (2-4) : 413 - 430
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1995, EVALUATING PREDICTIO
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2004, SENSITIVITY ANAL PRA
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2015, HDB UNCERTAINTY QUAN
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2010, STORM WATER MANAGEME
  • [7] *ANSI, 1998, 3201998 ANSI NCITS
  • [8] Aouissi J., 2013, 2013 5 INT C MOD
  • [9] Influence of rainfall observation network on model calibration and application
    Bardossy, A.
    Das, T.
    [J]. HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2008, 12 (01) : 77 - 89
  • [10] Managing uncertainty in integrated environmental modelling: The UncertWeb framework
    Bastin, Lucy
    Cornford, Dan
    Jones, Richard
    Heuvelink, Gerard B. M.
    Pebesma, Edzer
    Stasch, Christoph
    Nativi, Stefano
    Mazzetti, Paolo
    Williams, Matthew
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2013, 39 : 116 - 134