Energy expenditure of transfemoral amputees walking on a horizontal and tilted treadmill simulating different outdoor walking conditions

被引:22
作者
Starholm, Inger-Marie [1 ]
Gjovaag, Terje [1 ]
Mengshoel, Anne Marit [2 ]
机构
[1] Oslo Coll Univ, Dept Hlth Sci, Prosthet & Orthot programme, N-0130 Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Fac Med, Hlth Sci Sect, Oslo, Norway
关键词
VO(2max); walking economy; gait; self-selected walking speed; prosthesis; GAIT; AMPUTATION; FITNESS; COST;
D O I
10.3109/03093640903585016
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Transfemoral amputees often report that walking on tilted pavements or on terrain with the prosthesis on the side of higher elevation is quite strenuous. This study investigates the energy expenditure of transfemoral amputees (n = 8) on a motorized treadmill, simulating different strenuous outdoor walking conditions. Oxygen uptake at self-selected speed of gait was measured during walking at three different treadmill positions: (i) Horizontal treadmill, (ii) 3% tilt in the sagittal plane and (iii) 3% tilt in both the sagittal and frontal plane of the treadmill. The difference in median values of oxygen uptake between position (i) and (ii) was 4.3%, and 16.4% between position (ii) and (iii) (p <= 0.05, for both comparisons). The subjects utilized about 50% of their VO(2max) when walking in position (i) and (ii), with an increase to about 60% of their VO(2max) when walking in position (iii). Transfemoral amputees use significantly more energy when walking on a moderately tilted surface in the frontal plane compared to walking with a tilt in the sagittal plane. This is probably because the prosthetic leg becomes functionally too long when the walking surface is tilted sideways, and the transfemoral amputees adopt a more energy consuming gait pattern.
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 194
页数:11
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [11] OGITA F, 2002, AM J PHYS MED REHABI, V31, P1737
  • [12] HUMAN ENERGY EXPENDITURE
    PASSMORE, R
    DURNIN, JVGA
    [J]. PHYSIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 1955, 35 (04) : 801 - 840
  • [13] PERONNET F, 1991, CAN J SPORT SCI, V16, P23
  • [14] Polit DF, 2004, NURSING RES PRINCIPL, DOI DOI 10.1016/0030-5073(76)90030-1
  • [15] Trans-femoral amputee gait: Socket-pelvis constraints and compensation strategies
    Rabuffetti, M
    Recalcati, M
    Ferrarin, M
    [J]. PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 29 (02) : 183 - 192
  • [16] Energy expenditure and biomechanical characteristics of lower limb amputee gait: The influence of prosthetic alignment and different prosthetic components
    Schmalz, T
    Blumentritt, S
    Jarasch, R
    [J]. GAIT & POSTURE, 2002, 16 (03) : 255 - 263
  • [17] SHVARTZ E, 1990, AVIAT SPACE ENVIR MD, V61, P3
  • [18] Energy cost of walking measurements in subjects with lower limb amputations: A comparison study between floor and treadmill test
    Traballesi, Marco
    Porcacchia, Paolo
    Averna, Tiziano
    Brunelli, Stefano
    [J]. GAIT & POSTURE, 2008, 27 (01) : 70 - 75
  • [19] WATERS R, 2004, ATLAS AMPUTATIONS LI
  • [20] ENERGY COST OF WALKING OF AMPUTEES - INFLUENCE OF LEVEL OF AMPUTATION
    WATERS, RL
    PERRY, J
    ANTONELLI, D
    HISLOP, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1976, 58 (01) : 42 - 46