Policy Integration for REDD plus : Insights from Mexico

被引:5
作者
Spiric, Jovanka [1 ,2 ]
Isabel Ramirez, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Consejo Nacl Ciencia & Tecnol CONACYT, Ciudad De Mexico 03940, Mexico
[2] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Ctr Invest Geog Ambiental, Campus Morelia, Morelia 58190, Michoacan, Mexico
来源
FORESTS | 2021年 / 12卷 / 08期
关键词
policy integration; REDD plus; sustainable rural development; jurisdictional approach; land-use sectors; deforestation; forest degradation; Mexico; CLIMATE-CHANGE; GOVERNANCE;
D O I
10.3390/f12081075
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
This paper investigates how the horizontal and vertical policy integration for REDD+ has been conceptualized and unfolded in Mexico during the REDD+ readiness and early implementation phase (2008-2019). We used the document analysis and interviews with key actors to identify changes that REDD+ induced in forestry and agriculture sectors' policy making and programs at the national level and in two REDD+ states, Campeche and Jalisco. The policy integration for REDD+ in Mexico is conceptualized as compatibility-within-a-framework, i.e., promotes coordination and compromises among the objectives of land-use policies endorsing sustainable rural development. The state environmental agencies play an active role in involving the agricultural authorities in formal and informal interactions. This resulted in the design (Campeche) and even implementation (Jalisco) of REDD+-aligned programs and instruments. The progress at the subnational level is hampered by the national agriculture and forestry agencies' policy inertia and lack of resources. To support the subnational REDD+ policy integration advancement, more resources and powers should be made available to the state environmental authorities which would help them directly reach more international funding and include other important REDD+ actors and establish mutually accountable relationships with them.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [21] Cejudo GM, 2016, GEST POLIT PUBLICA, V25, P3
  • [22] Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR), ESTR REG PEN YUC RED
  • [23] Comision Nacional Forestal (CONAFOR), 2015, MOD INT AR ACC TEMPR
  • [24] Comision Nacional Forestal (CONAFOR), 2018, PROGR I COM NAC FOR
  • [25] Comision Nacional Forestal (CONAFOR), 2017, EM RED IN IRE DOC ER
  • [26] Comision Nacional Forestal (CONAFOR), 2011, ESTR NAC REDD ENARED
  • [27] Comision Nacional Forestal (CONAFOR), 2013, FOR CARB PARTN FAC F
  • [28] Comision Nacional Forestal (CONAFOR), 2010, VIS MEX REDD HAC EST
  • [29] Comision Nacional Forestal (CONAFOR), 2017, ESTR NAC REDD 2017 2
  • [30] Comision Nacional Forestal (CONAFOR), 2015, NAT FOR REF EM LEV P