Spatial Coordination and Joint Bidding in Conservation Auctions

被引:13
作者
Banerjee, Simanti [1 ]
Cason, Timothy N. [2 ]
de Vries, Frans P. [3 ]
Hanley, Nick [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Dept Agr Econ, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Dept Econ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[3] Univ Stirling, Div Econ, Management Sch, Stirling, Scotland
[4] Univ Glasgow, Inst Biodivers Anim Hlth & Comparat Med, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
experiment; networks; communication; agri-environmental schemes; ecosystem services; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; AGGLOMERATION BONUS; INFORMATION; PERFORMANCE; EFFICIENCY; PROVISION; BENEFITS; HABITAT; PURCHASE; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1086/714601
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Spatial coordination of land use change is pivotal in agri-environmental policy to improve the delivery of environmental goods. This paper implements a laboratory experiment to study spatial coordination in a conservation auction. In addition to letting individual producers bid competitively against each other to supply environmental goods, we ask whether opportunities for joint bidding can enhance spatial coordination in the auction cost-effectively. Auction performance depends on the nature of incentives for individual bids; in particular, whether an agglomeration bonus is offered for individual bids. With an individual bonus in place, joint bidding gives no improvement in either environmental benefits procured or cost-effectiveness. Absent an individual bonus, joint bidding improves environmental performance but can decrease cost-effectiveness. Further, across both individual and joint bidding treatments, the average environmental benefits, degree of spatial coordination, and cost-effectiveness are greater, and amount of seller markups lower, with multiple-round bidding compared to single-round bidding.
引用
收藏
页码:1013 / 1049
页数:37
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Abele L.G., 1979, P 1 C SCI RES NATL P, V1, P89
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Combinatorial Auctions
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, AM J AGR ECON, DOI DOI 10.2307/1244139
[4]   INFORMATION ACCESS, CONSERVATION PRACTICE CHOICE, AND RENT SEEKING IN CONSERVATION PROCUREMENT AUCTIONS: EVIDENCE FROM A LABORATORY EXPERIMENT [J].
Banerjee, Simanti ;
Conte, Marc N. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 100 (05) :1407-1426
[5]   Information and Auction Performance: A Laboratory Study of Conservation Auctions for Spatially Contiguous Land Management [J].
Banerjee, Simanti ;
Kwasnica, Anthony M. ;
Shortle, James S. .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2015, 61 (03) :409-431
[6]   The Impact of Information Provision on Agglomeration Bonus Performance: An Experimental Study on Local Networks [J].
Banerjee, Simanti ;
de Vries, Frans P. ;
Hanley, Nick ;
van Soest, Daan P. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 96 (04) :1009-1029
[7]   Remnant woodland biodiversity gains under 10 years of revealed-price incentive payments [J].
Bond, Anthelia J. ;
O'Connor, Patrick J. ;
Cavagnaro, Timothy R. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2019, 56 (07) :1827-1838
[8]   Improving cost-efficiency of conservation auctions with joint bidding [J].
Calel, Raphael .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2012, 1 (02) :128-145
[9]  
Cason T. N., 2004, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, V86, P1211, DOI 10.1111/j.0002-9092.2004.00666.x
[10]  
Cason TN, 2011, RES EXP ECON, V14, P77, DOI 10.1108/S0193-2306(2011)0000014006