Unity and division - National symbols in Macedonia, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Russia

被引:0
作者
Kolsto, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
来源
OSTEUROPA | 2003年 / 53卷 / 07期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
With regard to nationalism and symbolic nation-building, there seems to be a crucial difference between old, established and new, insecure states. In the former the flags and other national symbols unite the nation, and in the latter they often fail to fulfil this most important function as promoters of national unity. Instead, they often reveal strong divisions within the putative nation. There are no inherent qualities in state symbols that prevent them from being accepted, and the divisiveness vs. unifying potential of new state symbols is first and foremost a function of who they are associated with and how they are exploited politically. In this article these dynamics are examined in four countries: Macedonia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Belarus and Russia.
引用
收藏
页码:995 / +
页数:21
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, TIMES
[2]  
ARVIDSSON C, 1984, OSTSTATSTUDIER TEORI, pS34
[3]  
BILLIG M, 1995, BANAL NATIONALISM, pS8
[4]   The regulation of prostaglandin output from term intact fetal membranes by anti-inflammatory cytokines [J].
Brown, NL ;
Alvi, SA ;
Elder, MG ;
Bennett, PR ;
Sullivan, MHF .
IMMUNOLOGY, 2000, 99 (01) :124-133
[5]  
CASTROIADIS C, 1987, IMAGINARY I SOC, pS131
[6]  
CRAMPTON RJ, BALKANS 2 WORLD WAR, pS295
[7]  
GLINKAS M, 1836, LEBEN ZAR
[8]  
Hosbawm Eric., 1983, The Invention of Tradition
[9]  
KOLSTO P, 2000, NATION BUILDING RUSS, pS157
[10]  
MARPLES DR, 1999, BELARUS DENATIONALIZ, pS75