Integrating Formal Technology Assessment into an Integrated Healthcare Delivery System: Smart Innovation

被引:9
作者
Landaas, Erik J. [1 ]
Baird, Geoffrey S. [2 ]
Hansen, Ryan N. [1 ]
Flum, David R. [3 ]
Sullivan, Sean D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Comparat Hlth Outcomes Policy & Econ Inst, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Lab Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Surg, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
Hospital-based; Technology; Assessment; Device; Adoption; ASSESSMENT HTA; HOSPITALS; COVERAGE; EUROPE;
D O I
10.1017/S0266462319003465
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives We designed, developed, and implemented a new hospital-based health technology assessment (HB-HTA) program called Smart Innovation. Smart Innovation is a decision framework that reviews and makes technology adoption decisions. Smart Innovation was meant to replace the fragmented and complex process of procurement and adoption decisions at our institution. Because use of new medical technologies accounts for approximately 50 percent of the growth in healthcare spending, hospitals and integrated delivery systems are working to develop better processes and methods to sharpen their approach to adoption and management of high cost medical innovations. Methods The program has streamlined the decision-making process and added a robust evidence review for new medical technologies, aiming to balance efficiency with rigorous evidence standards. To promote system-wide adoption, the program engaged a broad representation of leaders, physicians, and administrators to gain support. Results To date, Smart Innovation has conducted eleven HB-HTAs and made clinician-led adoption decisions that have resulted in over $5 million dollars in cost avoidance. These are comprised of five laboratory tests, three software-assisted systems, two surgical devices, and one capital purchase. Conclusions Smart Innovation has achieved cost savings, avoided uncertain or low-value technologies, and assisted in the implementation of new technologies that have strong evidence. The keys to its success have been the program's collaborative and efficient decision-making systems, partnerships with clinicians, executive support, and proactive role with vendors.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 63
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Adedeji W A, 2016, Ann Ib Postgrad Med, V14, P56
[2]  
[Anonymous], TECHN CHANG GROWTH H
[3]   Managed care and technology adoption in health care: evidence from magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Baker, LC .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2001, 20 (03) :395-421
[4]   GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence [J].
Balshem, Howard ;
Helfand, Mark ;
Schuenemann, Holger J. ;
Oxman, Andrew D. ;
Kunz, Regina ;
Brozek, Jan ;
Vist, Gunn E. ;
Falck-Ytter, Yngve ;
Meerpohl, Joerg ;
Norris, Susan ;
Guyatt, Gordon H. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 64 (04) :401-406
[5]  
British Medical Journal (BMJ), 2007, BRIT MED J, V334, P1
[6]  
Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, 2019, OUR INN MOD
[7]  
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2019, HOSP VAL BAS PURCH
[8]   How hospitals confront new technology [J].
Coye, MJ ;
Kell, J .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2006, 25 (01) :163-173
[9]   Hospital-Based Health Technology Assessment: Developments to Date [J].
Gagnon, Marie-Pierre .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2014, 32 (09) :819-824
[10]   Health Technology Assessment at the University of California-San Francisco [J].
Gutowski, Christina ;
Maa, John ;
Hoo, Kent Soo ;
Bozic, Kevin .
JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, 2011, 56 (01) :15-29