Managing paradoxical tensions during the implementation of lean capabilities for improvement

被引:58
作者
Maalouf, Malek [1 ]
Gammelgaard, Britta [2 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, Dept Business & Management, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Copenhagen Business Sch, Dept Operat Management, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Denmark; Lean; Continuous improvement; Tension; Paradox; Organizational paradox; ORGANIZATIONAL-CHANGE; JOB DESIGN; MODEL; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; WORKING; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1108/IJOPM-10-2014-0471
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - Through the identification and investigation of the organisational paradoxes in lean, the purpose of this paper is to deepen the understanding of lean implementation intricacies, and contribute to sustaining lean in companies. Design/methodology/approach - Case study based on semi-structured interviews with participants in lean conversion from three companies in Denmark. The companies come from different business sectors: public transport, healthcare and finance. Findings - This study identifies three types of organisational paradoxes in lean: organising, performing and belonging. The study also points to a range managerial responses used for dealing with the three paradoxes and facilitating lean transformation. Research limitations/implications - This is a theory development paper which increases the understanding regarding the role of the organisational paradoxes in facilitating or hindering lean transformation. Practical implications - The study generates insights which help managers identify and deal with the individual motivations for opposing lean practices, and thus facilitates lean transformation. Originality/value - This study adds clarity to the process of managing lean implementation by identifying three different motivations for people to oppose lean transformation. The study also recommends managerial actions for dealing with each situation.
引用
收藏
页码:687 / 709
页数:23
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system [J].
Adler, PS ;
Goldoftas, B ;
Levine, DI .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (01) :43-68
[2]   Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive [J].
Adler, PS ;
Borys, B .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1996, 41 (01) :61-89
[3]   Managing Innovation Paradoxes: Ambidexterity Lessons from Leading Product Design Companies [J].
Andriopoulos, Constantine ;
Lewis, Marianne W. .
LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2010, 43 (01) :104-122
[4]   Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation [J].
Andriopoulos, Constantine ;
Lewis, Marianne W. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (04) :696-717
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, THIS IS LEAN
[6]  
Argyris C., 1988, Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management, P255
[7]  
Bonas KS, 1996, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V22, P1144
[8]   The role of facilitators in project action learning implementation [J].
Cao, Rui ;
Chuah, Kong Bieng ;
Chau, Yiu Chung ;
Kwong, Kar Fai ;
Law, Mo Yin .
LEARNING ORGANIZATION, 2012, 19 (05) :414-+
[9]   Is "lean" a universal production system? Batch production in the automotive industry [J].
Cooney, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2002, 22 (9-10) :1130-1147
[10]   Job design under lean manufacturing and its impact on employee outcomes [J].
Cullinane, Sarah-Jane ;
Bosak, Janine ;
Flood, Patrick C. ;
Demerouti, Evangelia .
ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2013, 3 (01) :41-61