COOPERATION-COMPETITION MODEL OF TRANSPORTATION CONSTRUCTION PROJECT FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF BUDGET ALLOCATION

被引：0

作者：

Lin, Maw-Cherng ^{[2
]}

Wu, Edward Ming-Yang ^{[1
]}

Teng, Junn-Yuan ^{[3
]}

Huang, Wen-Chih ^{[4
]}

机构：

[1] I Shou Univ, Dept Civil & Ecol Engn, Kaohsiung Cty, Taiwan

[2] Taipei City Govt, Dept Rapid Transit Syst, Taipei, Taiwan

[3] Huafan Univ, Dept Ind Engn & Management Informat, Taipei Cty, Taiwan

[4] Kainan Univ, Dept Transportat Technol & Management, Taoyuan Cty, Taiwan

来源：

JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-TAIWAN | 2010年 / 18卷 / 06期

关键词：

transportation construction project; budget allocation; cooperation-competition model; group decision-making; INVESTMENT;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

T [工业技术];

学科分类号：

08 ;

摘要：

The resource-allocation principle, which combines policy and budget, is the basic criterion for public-policy planning of a government in the present era. It can make the policy target, construction project, and budget work together closely. The transportation construction project has a certain degree of relativity under a target; so when selecting projects, a division of levels should be carried out according to the priority of project desirability [19] Furthermore, the relativity of potential cooperation-competition between projects must be identified to avoid any waste of limited resources. This is the focus point that will be discussed in this paper. Lastly, this research classified the cooperation-competition relation of a construction project into independent project, complementary project, overlapping project, and common complementary overlapping project. This research made a subjective judgment based on relevant domain experts' professional accomplishments, and then identified the experts' consensus.

引用

页码：915 / 923

页数：9

共 22 条

[1] [Anonymous], 1979, Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications: a state-of-the-art survey
[2] [Anonymous], J PUBLIC EC
[3] CRITERIA FOR SOCIAL INVESTMENT
ARROW, KJ
[J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1965, 1 (01) : 1 - &
[4] RECENT ADVANCES IN R AND D BENEFIT MEASUREMENT AND PROJECT SELECTION METHODS
BAKER, N
FREELAND, J
[J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE SERIES B-APPLICATION, 1975, 21 (10): : 1164 - 1175
[5] TACKLING AN MCDM-PROBLEM WITH THE HELP OF SOME RESULTS FROM FUZZY SET-THEORY
CARLSSON, C
[J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1982, 10 (03) : 270 - 281
[6] Chankong V., 2008, Multiobjective Decision Making Theory and Methodology
[7] FAYETTE JR, 1981, MULTIPLE CRITERIA AN, P137
[8] THE SOCIAL TIME PREFERENCE DISCOUNT RATE IN COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
FELDSTEIN, MS
[J]. ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1964, 74 (294) : 360 - 379
[9] Gear T. E., 1980, Decision Sciences, V11, P738, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1980.tb01174.x
[10] Keeney RL, 1976, Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences, and Value Tradeoffs

← 1 2 3 →