The Quality of Care and Support (QOCS) for people with disability scale: Development and psychometric properties

被引:22
作者
Lucas-Carrasco, Ramona [1 ]
Eser, Erhan [2 ]
Hao, Yuantao [3 ]
McPherson, Kathryn M. [4 ]
Green, Ann [5 ]
Kullmann, Lajos [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Dept Methodol, Fac Psychol, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Celal Bayar Univ, Fac Med, Dept Publ Hlth, Manisa, Turkey
[3] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Med Stat & Epidemiol, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Auckland Univ Technol, Hlth & Rehabil Res Inst, Person Centred Res Ctr, Auckland, New Zealand
[5] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Med, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[6] Eotvos Lorand Univ, Fac Special Educ, Budapest, Hungary
关键词
Quality of care; Psychometrics; Intellectual disability; Physical disability; INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES; HEALTH-CARE; SATISFACTION; LIFE; INSTRUMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ridd.2010.12.030
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
This paper describes the development of a Quality of Care and Support (QOCS) scale for use with adult persons with physical and intellectual disabilities. In the pilot phase of the study, 12 centers from around the world carried out focus groups with people with physical and disabilities, their carers, and with professionals in order to identify themes that were relevant for their quality of care. Items generated from the focus groups were then tested in a pilot study with 1400 respondents from 15 different centers worldwide, with items being tested and reduced using both classical and modern psychometric methods. A field trial study was then carried out with 3772 respondents, again with the use of both classical and modern psychometric methods. The outcome of the two rounds of data collection and analysis is a 17-item module for assessment of quality of care in physically or intellectually disabled people. Further modifications are also proposed for the use of the QOCS with adults with intellectual disabilities, including simplification of wording of some of the items, the use of a three-point response scale, and the inclusion of smiley faces. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1212 / 1225
页数:14
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, RUMM2020 RASCH UNIDI
[2]   A longitudinal evaluation of persons with disabilities: Does a longitudinal definition help define who receives necessary care? [J].
Chan, Leighton ;
Ciol, Marcia A. ;
Shumway-Cook, Anne ;
Yorkston, Kathryn M. ;
Dudgeon, Brian J. ;
Asch, Steven M. ;
Hoffman, Jeanne M. .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2008, 89 (06) :1023-1030
[3]  
den Oudsten B. L., DISABILITY IN PRESS
[4]   THE SATISFACTION WITH LIFE SCALE [J].
DIENER, E ;
EMMONS, RA ;
LARSEN, RJ ;
GRIFFIN, S .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 1985, 49 (01) :71-75
[5]  
Fadyl J., QUALITY SAF IN PRESS
[6]  
Glaser B., 1967, DISCOV GROUNDED THEO, DOI DOI 10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014
[7]   Accessibility of primary care physicians' offices for people with disabilities -: An analysis of compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act [J].
Grabois, EW ;
Nosek, MA ;
Rossi, CD .
ARCHIVES OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 1999, 8 (01) :44-51
[8]  
Guruge Sepali, 2002, Can J Nurs Res, V34, P25
[9]   Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment [J].
Harper, A ;
Power, M .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1998, 28 (03) :551-558
[10]  
Harris Interactive Inc, 2000, 2000 NAT ORG DIS HAR