Readability of the Most Commonly Accessed Online Patient Education Materials Pertaining to Surgical Treatments of the Spine

被引:15
作者
Phan, Amy [1 ]
Jubril, Ayodeji [1 ]
Menga, Emmanuel [1 ]
Mesfin, Addisu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sch Med & Dent, 601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
关键词
Cervical spine; Flesch-Kincaid; Health literacy; Patient education; Readability; Reading level; ORTHOPEDIC SURGEONS; AMERICAN ACADEMY; HEALTH LITERACY; INFORMATION; INTERNET;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2021.06.010
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The American Medical Association and National Institutes of Health have recommended that patient education materials should be written at the sixth grade reading level to maximize patient comprehension. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the readability of Internet information for the 9 most common spinal surgeries. METHODS: We reviewed 90 online patient educational materials regarding the 9 most common spinal surgeries as reported by the North American Spine Society. A Google search was performed on March 23, 2019 for each surgery, and the top 10 most visited websites for each surgery were assessed for reading level using the Flesch-Kincaid formula. RESULTS: Using the Flesch-Kincaid formula, the average grade reading level of the 90 websites included was 12.82, with a reading ease of 37.04 ("difficult college"). Only 6 websites relayed information to patients at or below the national average of an eighth-grade reading level. The websites for bone morphogenic protein had the highest average grade reading level at 15.88 +/- 2.6. Lumbar microscopic discectomy had the lowest average grade reading level at 10.37 +/- 2.89. All surgical options discussed had an average readability above the recommended sixth grade reading level. CONCLUSIONS: The most accessed online materials for common spinal surgeries, not only exceeded the readability limits recommended by both the American Medical Association and the National Institutes of Health, but they also exceeded the average reading ability of most adults in the United States. Patients, therefore, might not fully comprehend the information from commonly accessed websites regarding surgical spine treatment options.
引用
收藏
页码:E583 / E588
页数:6
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Akinleye Sheriff D, 2018, Hand (N Y), V13, P705, DOI 10.1177/1558944717726138
[2]   Readability of patient education materials: Implications for clinical practice [J].
Albright, J ;
deGuzman, C ;
Acebo, P ;
Paiva, D ;
Faulkner, M ;
Swanson, J .
APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH, 1996, 9 (03) :139-143
[3]   Privacy in practice: professional discourse about information control in health care [J].
Anthony, Denise L. ;
Stablein, Timothy .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 30 (02) :207-226
[4]   Sources and quality of literature addressing femoroacetabular impingement [J].
Ayeni, Olufemi R. ;
Chan, Kevin ;
Al-Asiri, Jamal ;
Chien, Teresa ;
Sprague, Sheila ;
Liew, Susan ;
Bhandari, Mohit .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2013, 21 (02) :415-419
[5]   Scoliosis Related Information on the Internet in China: Can Patients Benefit from This Information? [J].
Bao, Hongda ;
Zhu, Feng ;
Wang, Fei ;
Liu, Zhen ;
Bao, Mike H. ;
He, Shouyu ;
Zhu, Zezhang ;
Qiu, Yong .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (02)
[6]   Evaluating the source and content of orthopaedic information on the Internet - The case of carpal tunnel syndrome [J].
Beredjiklian, PK ;
Bozentka, DJ ;
Steinberg, DR ;
Bernstein, J .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2000, 82A (11) :1540-1543
[7]   Readability of the Patient Education Section of the AOFAS Website [J].
Bluman, Eric M. ;
Foley, Ryan P. ;
Chiodo, Christopher P. .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 30 (04) :287-291
[8]  
Brooks B A, 2001, Orthop Nurs, V20, P69, DOI 10.1097/00006416-200109000-00011
[9]   Patients' use of the Internet for medical information [J].
Diaz, JA ;
Griffith, RA ;
Ng, JJ ;
Reinert, SE ;
Friedmann, PD ;
Moulton, AW .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 17 (03) :180-185
[10]  
Doak C.H., 1996, Teaching patients with low literacy skills