Cancer-related concerns of spouses of women with breast cancer

被引:29
作者
Fletcher, Kristin A. [1 ]
Lewis, Frances Marcus [1 ,2 ]
Haberman, Mel R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Nursing, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[3] Washington State Univ, Coll Nursing, Spokane, WA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
breast cancer; oncology; cancer-related pressures; demands of illness; spouse adjustment; questionnaire development; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; DYADIC ADJUSTMENT; PERSPECTIVE; HUSBANDS; INTERVENTION; DISTRESS; ILLNESS; SUPPORT; COUPLES; MOTHER;
D O I
10.1002/pon.1665
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To describe spouses' reported cancer-related demands attributed to their wife's breast cancer, and to test the construct and predictive validity of a brief standardized measure of these demands. Methods: Cross-sectional and longitudinal data were obtained from 151 spouses of women newly diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer. Descriptive statistics were computed to describe spouses' dominant cancer-related demands, and multivariate regression analyses tested the construct and predictive validity of the standardized measure. Results: Five categories of spouses' cancer-related demands were identified, such as concerns about spouses' own functioning, wife's well-being and response to treatment, couples' sexual activities, the family's and children's well-being, and the spouses' role in supporting their wives. A 33-item short version of the standardized measure of cancer demands demonstrated construct and predictive validity that was comparable to a 123-item version of the same questionnaire. Greater numbers of illness demands occurred when spouses were more depressed and had less confidence in their ability to manage the impact of the cancer (F = 18.08 (3,103), p<0.001). Predictive validity was established by the short form's ability to significantly predict the quality of marital communication and spouses' self-efficacy at a 2-month interval. Conclusion: The short version of the standardized measure of cancer-related demands shows promise for future application in clinic settings. Additional testing of the questionnaire is warranted. Spouses' breast cancer-related demands deserve attention by providers. In the absence of assisting them, spouses' illness pressures have deleterious consequences for the quality of marital communication and spouses' self-confidence. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1094 / 1101
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J APPL PSYCHOL MEASU
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
[3]   Is perceived family support a relevant variable in psychological distress? A sample of prostate and breast cancer couples [J].
Baider, L ;
Ever-Hadani, P ;
Goldzweig, G ;
Wygoda, MR ;
Peretz, T .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2003, 55 (05) :453-460
[4]   Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective [J].
Bandura, A .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 52 :1-26
[5]  
Bandura A, 1986, Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, DOI DOI 10.5465/AMR.1987.4306538
[6]   Living with a depressed spouse [J].
Benazon, NR ;
Coyne, JC .
JOURNAL OF FAMILY PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 14 (01) :71-79
[7]   QUALITY-OF-LIFE OF 125 ADULTS SURVIVING 6-18 YEARS AFTER BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANTATION [J].
BUSH, NE ;
HABERMAN, M ;
DONALDSON, G ;
SULLIVAN, KM .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1995, 40 (04) :479-490
[8]   Partners of cancer patients: Part I. Impact, adjustment, and coping across the illness trajectory [J].
Carlson, LE ;
Bultz, BD ;
Speca, M ;
St Pierre, M .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOCIAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (02) :39-63
[9]   Measuring depression in African American cancer survivors: The reliability and validity of the center for Epidemiologic Study-Depression (CES-D) Scale [J].
Conerly, RC ;
Baker, F ;
Dye, J ;
Douglas, CY ;
Zabora, J .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 7 (01) :107-114
[10]   COUPLES COPING WITH A MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION - A CONTEXTUAL PERSPECTIVE ON WIVES DISTRESS [J].
COYNE, JC ;
SMITH, DAF .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 61 (03) :404-412