Life cycle assessment of selected future energy crops for Europe

被引:40
作者
Rettenmaier, Nils [1 ]
Koeppen, Susanne [1 ]
Gaertner, Sven O. [1 ]
Reinhardt, Guido A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ifeu, Inst Energie & Umweltforsch Heidelberg GmbH, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
来源
BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR | 2010年 / 4卷 / 06期
关键词
biofuels; bioenergy; energy crops; life cycle assessment (LCA); greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions; land-use change (LUC); BIOFUELS; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1002/bbb.245
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology is increasingly used to determine the potential environmental impacts of biofuels and bioenergy. This paper presents the outcomes of screening LCAs of 13 future energy crops for Europe summarizing the results of the EC-funded project 4F CROPS - Future Crops for Food, Feed, Fiber and Fuel. For analysis, these dedicated energy crops - representing seven environmental zones in Europe - are combined with a multitude of processing and utilization options, resulting in 120 different biofuel and bioenergy chains. Compared to fossil fuels and energy carriers, all biofuel and bioenergy chains show environmental advantages in terms of life-cycle energy use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions but mostly disadvantages regarding other environmental impact categories. Quantitative results vary widely across environmental zones, depending on crop species, agricultural inputs, and yield. Moreover, coproduct accounting and coproduct utilization, as well as the agricultural and fossil reference system play an important role. In view of environmental advantages and disadvantages, subjective trade-offs are required between the environmental impact categories. If saving GHG emissions is given the highest environmental priority, combined heat and power generation from herbaceous lignocellulosic crops is the most efficient option in terms of land use, provided that the biomass is cultivated on surplus agricultural land, thus avoiding indirect land-use change. (C) 2010 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
引用
收藏
页码:620 / 636
页数:17
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, OFFICIAL J EUROPEAN, V52, P16
[2]  
[Anonymous], BASISDATEN OKOLOGISC
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, ENERGIE BIOMASSE GRU
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, SYNOPSIS CURRENT MOD
[5]   Will EU biofuel policies affect global agricultural markets? [J].
Banse, Martin ;
van Meijl, Hans ;
Tabeau, Andrzej ;
Woltjer, Geert .
EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 35 (02) :117-141
[6]   Good or bad bioethanol from a greenhouse gas perspective - What determines this? [J].
Borjesson, Pal .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2009, 86 (05) :589-594
[7]  
BRANDAO M, 2010, BIOMASS BIOENERG, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.BIOM-BIOE.2009.10.019
[8]   Global implications of biomass and biofuel use in Germany - Recent trends and future scenarios for domestic and foreign agricultural land use and resulting GHG emissions [J].
Bringezu, S. ;
Schuetz, H. ;
Arnold, K. ;
Merten, F. ;
Kabasci, S. ;
Borelbach, P. ;
Michels, C. ;
Reinhardt, G. A. ;
Rettenmaier, N. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2009, 17 :S57-S68
[9]   Impacts of EU biofuels directives on global markets and EU environmental quality: An integrated PE, global CGE analysis [J].
Britz, Wolfgang ;
Hertel, Thomas W. .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 142 (1-2) :102-109
[10]   Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: Key issues, ranges and recommendations [J].
Cherubini, Francesco ;
Bird, Neil D. ;
Cowie, Annette ;
Jungmeier, Gerfried ;
Schlamadinger, Bernhard ;
Woess-Gallasch, Susanne .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2009, 53 (08) :434-447