Effects of task complexity on the fluency and lexical complexity in EFL students' argumentative writing

被引:179
|
作者
Ong, Justina [1 ]
Zhang, Lawrence Jun [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, English Language & Literature Acad Grp, Natl Inst Educ, Singapore 637616, Singapore
关键词
Task complexity; Cognitive processing; L2 writing quality; Fluency; Accuracy; Lexical complexity; Chinese; EFL student writers; ACCURACY; PERFORMANCE; KNOWLEDGE; L1;
D O I
10.1016/j.jslw.2010.10.003
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Based on Robinson's (2001a,b, 2003) Cognition Hypothesis and Skehan's (1998) Limited Attentional Capacity Model this study explored the effects of task complexity on the fluency and lexical complexity of 108 EFL students argumentative writing Task complexity was manipulated using three factors (1) availability of planning time (2) provision of ideas and macro-structure, and (3) draft availability All participants were randomly assigned to the above three factors in which the availability of the planning time factor had 4 levels (extended pre-task, pre-task free writing and control), the provision of the ideas and macro-structure factor had 3 levels (topic ideas and macro-structure given, topic and ideas given, and topic given), and the draft availability factor had 2 levels (draft available vs draft unavailable) using their writing task proficiency scores as a measure Results showed that (1) increasing task complexity with respect to the planning time continuum, produced significantly greater fluency II (mean number of words produced per minute of the total time spent on the task) and lexical complexity, (2) increasing task complexity through the provision of ideas and macro-structure, produced significantly greater lexical complexity but no effect on fluency I (mean number of words produced per minute of transcription) or fluency II, and (3) increasing task complexity through draft availability produced no significant differences in fluency and lexical complexity Implications of these findings are discussed (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 233
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The effects of task complexity and language aptitude on EFL learners' writing performance
    Liu, Chun-yan
    Sun, Li-ting
    He, Yan
    Wu, Nian-zhe
    ASSESSING WRITING, 2023, 58
  • [33] The effects of cognitive task complexity on writing complexity
    Frear, Mark Wain
    Bitchener, John
    JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2015, 30 : 45 - 57
  • [34] Writing Task Complexity, Task Condition, and the Efficacy of Feedback
    Ghaderi, Esmaeil
    Rouhi, Afsar
    Tabrizi, Amir Reza Nemat
    Jafarigohar, Manoochehr
    Hemmati, Fatemeh
    JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE AND EDUCATION, 2022, 8 (04): : 73 - 87
  • [35] Writing task complexity, students' motivational beliefs, anxiety and their writing production in English as a second language
    Rahimi, Muhammad
    Zhang, Lawrence Jun
    READING AND WRITING, 2019, 32 (03) : 761 - 786
  • [36] The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, complexity, and fluency in EFL learners' oral production
    Ahmadian, Mohammad Javad
    Tavakoli, Mansoor
    LANGUAGE TEACHING RESEARCH, 2011, 15 (01) : 35 - 59
  • [37] The Effect of Task Complexity on EFL learners' Written performance
    Salimi, Asghar
    Dadaspour, Soghra
    Asadollahfam, Hassan
    2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 2011, 2011, 29
  • [38] Mapping the associations among task complexity, emotionality, and linguistic complexity in L2 writing
    Tabari, Mahmoud Abdi
    Lu, Xiaofei
    Wang, Yizhou
    LANGUAGE AWARENESS, 2025, 34 (02) : 345 - 372
  • [39] Effects of manipulating writing task complexity on learners' performance in completing vocabulary and syntactic tasks
    Zhan, Ju
    Sun, Qiyu
    Zhang, Lawrence Jun
    LANGUAGE TEACHING RESEARCH, 2024, 28 (03) : 1011 - 1032
  • [40] The effect of mixed planning on the fluency and complexity of EFL learners' writing performance
    Seifollahi, Mahnaz
    Tamjid, Nasrin Hadidi
    4TH WORLD CONFERENCE ON EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES (WCES-2012), 2012, 46 : 764 - 770