The influence of ethical attitudes on the demand for environmental recreation: incorporating lexicographic preferences

被引:24
作者
Gelso, BR
Peterson, JM
机构
[1] US EPA, Off Water, Water Policy Staff, Washington, DC 20460 USA
[2] Kansas State Univ, Dept Agr Econ, Manhattan, KS 66502 USA
关键词
environmental ethics; protest bids; use values; lexicographic preferences;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.01.021
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
This article examines the relationships between different ethical attitudes toward environmental quality and the 'use' values obtained from the environment. In particular, we consider individuals who have duty-based ethical attitudes that lead to lexicographic preferences for environmental quality. We show that individuals with duty-based ethical attitudes have recreation demand functions that are 'kinked,' exhibiting perfectly inelastic behavior over some range of income. However, the kinks cannot be identified from typical cross-sectional data, and to the extent that observed recreation demand for these individuals differs from those with neoclassical preferences, such differences could be captured empirically through a proxy variable that measures ethical attitudes. A more fundamental issue is that changes in welfare for duty-based individuals cannot be determined from their estimated demand function: while an exogenous rise in environmental quality is likely to increase the demand for recreation by these individuals, additional recreation is not the reason for an improvement in well-being. An empirical model to identify the effect of ethical attitudes on recreation is illustrated using survey data on stated preferences for visits to urban parks. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 45
页数:11
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Respondents to contingent valuation surveys: Consumers or citizens? [J].
Blamey, R ;
Common, M ;
Quiggin, J .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 39 (03) :263-288
[2]  
Blamey RK, 1999, HANDBOOK OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, P809
[3]  
BRADEN J.B., 1991, MEASURING DEMAND ENV
[4]   Do Existence Values for Cost Benefit Analysis Exist? [J].
M. Common ;
I. Reid ;
R. Blamey .
Environmental and Resource Economics, 1997, 9 (2) :225-238
[5]   SAMPLE NONRESPONSE BIAS AND AGGREGATE BENEFITS IN CONTINGENT VALUATION - AN EXAMINATION OF EARLY, LATE AND NON-RESPONDENTS [J].
DALECKI, MG ;
WHITEHEAD, JC ;
BLOMQUIST, GC .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1993, 38 (02) :133-143
[6]  
Deaton A., 1993, EC CONSUMER BEHAV, P27
[7]  
Des Jardins J., 1997, Environmental Ethics: An Introduction to Environmental Philosophy
[8]  
Edwards S.F., 1986, Northeastern Journal of Agriculture, V15, P145
[9]   RETHINKING EXISTENCE VALUES [J].
EDWARDS, SF .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1992, 68 (01) :120-122
[10]  
FUGITT D, 1999, COST BENEFIT ANAL PU