A Review of Probabilistic Genotyping Systems: EuroForMix, DNAStatistX and STRmix™

被引:37
作者
Gill, Peter [1 ,2 ]
Benschop, Corina [3 ]
Buckleton, John [4 ,5 ]
Bleka, Oyvind [1 ]
Taylor, Duncan [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Forens Sci, Forens Genet Res Grp, N-0372 Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Dept Forens Med, N-0315 Oslo, Norway
[3] Netherlands Forens Inst, Div Biol Traces, POB 24044, NL-2490 AA The Hague, Netherlands
[4] Univ Auckland, Dept Stat, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
[5] Inst Environm Sci & Res Ltd, Private Bag 92021, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
[6] Forens Sci SA, GPO Box 2790, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[7] Flinders Univ S Australia, Sch Biol Sci, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
关键词
probabilistic genotyping; EuroForMix; DNAStatistX; STRmix(TM); MIXED DNA PROFILES; FORENSIC GENETICS RECOMMENDATIONS; ISFG COLLABORATIVE EXERCISE; PARALLEL SEQUENCING DATA; LIKELIHOOD RATIOS; INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY; MIXTURE PROFILES; EXPERT SOFTWARE; SINGLE-SOURCE; CONTRIBUTORS;
D O I
10.3390/genes12101559
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Probabilistic genotyping has become widespread. EuroForMix and DNAStatistX are both based upon maximum likelihood estimation using a gamma model, whereas STRmix (TM) is a Bayesian approach that specifies prior distributions on the unknown model parameters. A general overview is provided of the historical development of probabilistic genotyping. Some general principles of interpretation are described, including: the application to investigative vs. evaluative reporting; detection of contamination events; inter and intra laboratory studies; numbers of contributors; proposition setting and validation of software and its performance. This is followed by details of the evolution, utility, practice and adoption of the software discussed.</p>
引用
收藏
页数:40
相关论文
共 222 条
[1]   The first Australian conviction resulting from a familial search [J].
Abarno, Damien ;
Sobieraj, Thomas ;
Summers, Chay ;
Taylor, Duncan .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2019, 51 :S56-S59
[2]   Letter to the Editor-Appropriate Standards for Verification and Validation of Probabilistic Genotyping Systems [J].
Adams, Nathaniel ;
Koppl, Roger ;
Krane, Dan ;
Thompson, William ;
Zabell, Sandy .
JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2018, 63 (01) :339-340
[3]   NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION [J].
AKAIKE, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) :716-723
[4]   Inferring the Number of Contributors to Complex DNA Mixtures Using Three Methods: Exploring the Limits of Low-Template DNA Interpretation [J].
Alfonse, Lauren E. ;
Tejada, Genesis ;
Swaminathan, Harish ;
Lun, Desmond S. ;
Grgicak, Catherine M. .
JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2017, 62 (02) :308-316
[5]   DNA mixtures interpretation - A proof-of-concept multi-software comparison highlighting different probabilistic methods' performances on challenging samples [J].
Alladio, E. ;
Omedei, M. ;
Cisana, S. ;
D'Amico, G. ;
Caneparo, D. ;
Vincenti, M. ;
Garofano, P. .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL-GENETICS, 2018, 37 :143-150
[6]   Relaxing the assumption of unrelatedness in the numerator and denominator of likelihood ratios for DNA mixtures [J].
Allen, Paul Stafford ;
Pugh, Simone N. ;
Bright, Jo-Anne ;
Taylor, Duncan A. ;
Curran, James M. ;
Kerr, Zane ;
Buckleton, John S. .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL-GENETICS, 2021, 51
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1951, Biometrika, DOI DOI 10.2307/2332601
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2017, S CR 2014 007
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2016, SCI JUSTICE
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2020, ACCESS STRMIX SOFTWA