Task Context and Frontal Lobe Activation in the Stroop Task

被引:68
|
作者
Floden, Darlene [1 ,2 ]
Vallesi, Antonino [1 ,3 ]
Stuss, Donald T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Rotman Res Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[3] SISSA Int Sch Adv Studies, Trieste, Italy
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
ANTERIOR CINGULATE CORTEX; EVENT-RELATED FMRI; CONTROL MECHANISMS; RESPONSE CONFLICT; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; ERROR-DETECTION; INTERFERENCE; DISSOCIATION; INHIBITION; LESION;
D O I
10.1162/jocn.2010.21492
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The ability to step outside a routine-to select a new response over a habitual one-is a cardinal function of the frontal lobes. A large body of neuroimaging work now exists pointing to increased activation within the anterior cingulate when stimuli evoke competing responses (incongruent trials) relative to when responses converge (congruent trials). However, lesion evidence that the ACC is necessary in this situation is inconsistent. We hypothesized that this may be a consequence of different task procedures (context) used in lesion and neuroimaging studies. The present study attempted to reconcile the lesion and the fMRI findings by having subjects perform clinical and experimental versions of the Stroop task during BOLD fMRI acquisition. We examined the relationship of brain activation patterns, specifically within the anterior cingulate and left dorsolateral frontal regions, to congruent and incongruent trial types in different task presentations or contexts. The results confirmed our hypothesis that ACC activity is relatively specific to unblocked-uncued incongruent Stroop conditions that have not been used in large neuropsychological studies. Moreover, the size of the behavioral Stroop interference effect was significantly correlated with activity in ACC and left dorsolateral regions, although in different directions. The current results are discussed in terms of previous proposals for the functional roles of these regions in activating, monitoring, and task setting, and the relation of these findings to the disparate reports in recent case series is considered.
引用
收藏
页码:867 / 879
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effects of age and task context on Stroop task performance
    Mutter, SA
    Naylor, JC
    Patterson, ER
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2005, 33 (03) : 514 - 530
  • [2] The effects of age and task context on Stroop task performance
    Sharon A. Mutter
    Jenniffer C. Naylor
    Emily R. Patterson
    Memory & Cognition, 2005, 33 : 514 - 530
  • [3] Task conflict in the Stroop task: When Stroop interference decreases as Stroop facilitation increases in a low task conflict context
    Parris, Benjamin A.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5
  • [4] Age-related frontal lobe differences revealed by fMRI during a Stroop task
    Nielson, K
    Langenecker, S
    Rao, SM
    NEUROIMAGE, 2001, 13 (06) : S451 - S451
  • [5] Twenty questions task and frontal lobe dysfunction
    Upton, D
    Thompson, PJ
    ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 14 (02) : 203 - 216
  • [6] Effects of task context and fluctuations of attention on neural activity supporting performance of the Stroop task
    West, R
    Alain, C
    BRAIN RESEARCH, 2000, 873 (01) : 102 - 111
  • [7] Areas of Ischemia Associated with "Frontal Lobe'' Task Failure
    Gomez, Yessenia
    Hillis, Argye E.
    ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2011, 70 : S26 - S26
  • [8] Tackling frontal lobe-related functions in PKU through functional brain imaging: a Stroop task in adult patients
    Sundermann, Benedikt
    Pfleiderer, Bettina
    Moeller, Harald E.
    Schwindt, Wolfram
    Weglage, Josef
    Lepsien, Joeran
    Feldmann, Reinhold
    JOURNAL OF INHERITED METABOLIC DISEASE, 2011, 34 (03) : 711 - 721
  • [9] Motor adaptation is promoted by an incongruent Stroop task, but not by a congruent Stroop task
    Kimura, Takehide
    Nakano, Wataru
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2021, 239 (04) : 1295 - 1303
  • [10] Motor adaptation is promoted by an incongruent Stroop task, but not by a congruent Stroop task
    Takehide Kimura
    Wataru Nakano
    Experimental Brain Research, 2021, 239 : 1295 - 1303