Perceptual contributions to monosyllabic word intelligibility: Segmental, lexical, and noise replacement factors

被引:24
作者
Fogerty, Daniel [1 ]
Humes, Larry E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Dept Speech & Hearing Sci, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
关键词
ACOUSTIC LANDMARKS; VOWELS; CONSONANTS; SPEECH; RECOGNITION; STATISTICS; SYLLABLES; HEARING; CONTEXT; PROSODY;
D O I
10.1121/1.3493439
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
This study investigated the relative contributions of consonants and vowels to the perceptual intelligibility of monosyllabic consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) words. A noise replacement paradigm presented CVCs with only consonants or only vowels preserved. Results demonstrated no difference between overall word accuracy in these conditions; however, different error patterns were observed. A significant effect of lexical difficulty was demonstrated for both types of replacement, whereas the noise level used during replacement did not influence results. The contribution of consonant and vowel transitional information present at the consonant-vowel boundary was also explored. The proportion of speech presented, regardless of the segmental condition, overwhelmingly predicted performance. Comparisons were made with previous segment replacement results using sentences [Fogerty, and Kewley-Port (2009). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126, 847-857]. Results demonstrated that consonants contribute to intelligibility equally in both isolated CVC words and sentences. However, vowel contributions were mediated by context, with greater contributions to intelligibility in sentence contexts. Therefore, it appears that vowels in sentences carry unique speech cues that greatly facilitate intelligibility which are not informative and/or present during isolated word contexts. Consonants appear to provide speech cues that are equally available and informative during sentence and isolated word presentations. (C) 2010 Acoustical Society of America. [DOI: 10.1121/1.3493439]
引用
收藏
页码:3114 / 3125
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1984, 10 IND U PSYCH DEP S
[2]  
ANSI, 2004, S362004 ANSI
[3]   INCREASING THE INTELLIGIBILITY OF SPEECH THROUGH MULTIPLE PHONEMIC RESTORATIONS [J].
BASHFORD, JA ;
RIENER, KR ;
WARREN, RM .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1992, 51 (03) :211-217
[4]  
Boersma P., 2006, Praat: doing phonetics by computer
[5]   MATHEMATICAL TREATMENT OF CONTEXT EFFECTS IN PHONEME AND WORD RECOGNITION [J].
BOOTHROYD, A ;
NITTROUER, S .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1988, 84 (01) :101-114
[6]   Brain activation for consonants and vowels [J].
Carreiras, Manuel ;
Price, Cathy J. .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2008, 18 (07) :1727-1735
[7]   Are Vowels and Consonants Processed Differently? Event-related Potential Evidence with a Delayed Letter Paradigm [J].
Carreiras, Manuel ;
Gillon-Dowens, Margaret ;
Vergara, Marta ;
Perea, Manuel .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 21 (02) :275-288
[8]  
Cole RA, 1996, INT CONF ACOUST SPEE, P853, DOI 10.1109/ICASSP.1996.543255
[9]   SOME EXPERIMENTS ON THE PERCEPTION OF SYNTHETIC SPEECH SOUNDS [J].
COOPER, FS ;
DELATTRE, PC ;
LIBERMAN, AM ;
BORST, JM ;
GERSTMAN, LJ .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1952, 24 (06) :597-606
[10]   Constraints of vowels and consonants on lexical selection:: Cross-linguistic comparisons [J].
Cutler, A ;
Sebastián-Gallés, N ;
Soler-Vilageliu, O ;
van Ooijen, B .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2000, 28 (05) :746-755