Specific Targeting of Tumor Endothelial Cells by a Shiga-like Toxin-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Fusion Protein as a Novel Treatment Strategy for Pancreatic Cancer

被引:18
作者
Hotz, Birgit [1 ]
Backer, Marina V. [2 ]
Backer, Joseph M. [2 ]
Buhr, Heinz-J [1 ]
Hotz, Hubert G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Charite Sch Med, Dept Surg 1, D-12203 Berlin, Germany
[2] SibTech Inc, Brookfield, CT USA
来源
NEOPLASIA | 2010年 / 12卷 / 10期
关键词
IN-VITRO; FACTOR RECEPTORS; SOLID TUMORS; FACTOR VEGF; ANGIOGENESIS; EXPRESSION; INHIBITION; THERAPY; METASTASIS; CONJUGATE;
D O I
10.1593/neo.10418
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: Tumor endothelial cells express vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2). VEGF can direct toxins to tumor vessels through VEGFR-2 for antiangiogenic therapy. This study aimed to selectively damage the VEGFR-2-overexpressing vasculature of pancreatic cancer by SLT-VEGF fusion protein comprising VEGF and the A subunit of Shiga-like toxin which inhibits protein synthesis of cells with high VEGFR-2 expression. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Expression of VEGF and VEGF receptors was evaluated in human pancreatic cancer cells (AsPC-1, HPAF-2) and in normal human endothelial cells (HUVEC) by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Cells were treated with SLT-VEGF (0.1-10 nM), and cell viability, proliferation, and endothelial tube formation were assessed. Orthotopic pancreatic cancer (AsPC-1, HPAF-2) was induced in nude mice. Animals were treated with SLT-VEGF fusion protein alone or in combination with gemcitabine. Treatment began 3 days or 6 weeks after tumor induction. Primary tumor volume and dissemination were determined after 14 weeks. Microvessel density and expression of VEGF and VEGF receptors were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: SLT-VEGF did not influence proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells; HUVECs (low-level VEGFR-2) reduced their proliferation rate and tube formation but not their viability. SLT-VEGF fusion protein reduced tumor growth and dissemination, increasing 14-week survival (AsPC-1, up to 75%; HPAF-2, up to 83%). Results of gemcitabine were comparable with SLT-VEGF monotherapy. Combination partly increased the therapeutic effects in comparison to the respective monotherapies. Microvessel density was reduced in all groups. Intratumoral VEGFR-2 expression was found in endothelial but not in tumor cells. CONCLUSIONS: SLT-VEGF is toxic for tumor vasculature rather than for normal endothelial or pancreatic cancer cells. SLT-VEGF treatment in combination with gemcitabine may provide a novel approach for pancreatic cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:797 / U148
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Inhibition of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Signaling in Angiogenic Tumor Vasculature [J].
Backer, Marina V. ;
Hamby, Carl V. ;
Backer, Joseph M. .
TISSUE-SPECIFIC VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL SIGNALS AND VECTOR TARGETING, PART A, 2009, 67 :1-27
[2]   Vascular endothelial growth factor selectively targets boronated dendrimers to tumor vasculature [J].
Backer, MV ;
Gaynutdinov, TI ;
Patel, V ;
Bandyopadhyaya, AK ;
Thirumamagal, BTS ;
Tjarks, W ;
Barth, RF ;
Claffey, K ;
Backer, JM .
MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS, 2005, 4 (09) :1423-1429
[3]   Targeting endothelial cells overexpressing VEGFR-2: Selective toxicity of Shiga-like toxin-VEGF fusion proteins [J].
Backer, MV ;
Backer, JM .
BIOCONJUGATE CHEMISTRY, 2001, 12 (06) :1066-1073
[4]   Modes of resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy [J].
Bergers, Gabriele ;
Hanahan, Douglas .
NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2008, 8 (08) :592-603
[5]  
Brekken RA, 2000, CANCER RES, V60, P5117
[6]  
Brown JM, 1998, CANCER RES, V58, P1408
[7]  
BROWN LF, 1993, AM J PATHOL, V143, P1255
[8]  
Drevs J, 2000, CANCER RES, V60, P4819
[9]   ANGIOGENESIS IN CANCER, VASCULAR, RHEUMATOID AND OTHER DISEASE [J].
FOLKMAN, J .
NATURE MEDICINE, 1995, 1 (01) :27-31
[10]   Selective binding of VEGF(121) to one of the three vascular endothelial growth factor receptors of vascular endothelial cells [J].
GitayGoren, H ;
Cohen, T ;
Tessler, S ;
Soker, S ;
Gengrinovitch, S ;
Rockwell, P ;
Klagsbrun, M ;
Levi, BZ ;
Neufeld, G .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 1996, 271 (10) :5519-5523