Use of pharmacoeconomics information - Report of the ISPOR Task Force on use of pharmacoeconomic/health economic information in health-care decision making

被引:80
|
作者
Drummond, M [1 ]
Brown, R
Fendrick, AM
Fullerton, P
Neumann, P
Taylor, R
Barbieri, M
机构
[1] Univ York, Ctr Hlth Econ, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[2] MEDTAP Int, London, England
[3] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[7] Innovus Res, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, Scotland
关键词
cost-effectiveness analysis; decision making; guidelines; implementation;
D O I
10.1046/j.1524-4733.2003.64245.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objectives: Despite the growing number of pharmacoeconomic (PE)/health economic (HE) studies, very little is known about their use by decision makers. The objectives of the Task Force were to ensure that the good research practices of PE/HE studies pay attention to the needs of health-care decision makers and to develop a "toolbox" for the health-care decision maker wanting to interpret and use PE/HE studies. Methods: The membership of the Task Force consisted of individuals involved in making decisions about the availability or use of medicines and researchers into the use of economic evaluations. The group communicated by E-mail and face-to-face meetings. A literature review of decision makers' attitudes toward PE/HE studies and published economic evaluation guidelines was undertaken. In addition, a focus group discussion was held with opinion leaders in managed care pharmacy. Results: The literature review identified 16 surveys of decision makers' attitudes toward PE/HE studies and 15 published guidelines that outlined reporting requirements for economic evaluations. These were reviewed and classified. Based on the published literature and comments from decision makers, seven additional reporting requirements for studies were specified. Conclusions: While the Task Force's additional reporting requirements may be helpful to decision makers, they raise a number of issues. These include the feasibility of meeting the additional requirements, whether decision makers should receive more education in economic evaluation, and whether there should be more study of healthcare decision-making procedures themselves.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 416
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ECONOMIC-EVALUATION OF HEALTH-CARE AND POLICY-MAKING
    JOHANNESSON, M
    HEALTH POLICY, 1995, 33 (03) : 179 - 190
  • [32] Evidence-Based Knowledge Management: an approach to effectively promote good health-care decision-making in the Information Era
    Corrao, Salvatore
    Arcoraci, Vincenzo
    Arnone, Sabrina
    Calvo, Luigi
    Scaglione, Rosario
    Di Bernardo, Cristofaro
    Lagalla, Roberto
    Caputi, Achille Patrizio
    Licata, Giuseppe
    INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2009, 4 (02) : 99 - 106
  • [33] Evidence-Based Knowledge Management: an approach to effectively promote good health-care decision-making in the Information Era
    Salvatore Corrao
    Vincenzo Arcoraci
    Sabrina Arnone
    Luigi Calvo
    Rosario Scaglione
    Cristofaro Di Bernardo
    Roberto Lagalla
    Achille Patrizio Caputi
    Giuseppe Licata
    Internal and Emergency Medicine, 2009, 4 : 99 - 106
  • [34] Effective presentation of health care performance information for consumer decision making: A systematic review
    Kurtzman, Ellen T.
    Greene, Jessica
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2016, 99 (01) : 36 - 43
  • [35] Whose preferences should be elicited for use in health-care decision-making? A case study using anticoagulant therapy
    Mott, David John
    Najafzadeh, Mehdi
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2016, 16 (01) : 33 - 39
  • [36] The Information on Decision-making in Health: From Predictable to Unpredictable
    Souza, Vanessa de Lima e
    Borges, Maria Manuel
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH MANAGEMENT, 2023, 25 (04) : 850 - 859
  • [37] Use of weather and climate information for agricultural planning and decision making
    Coughlan, K. J.
    Huda, A. K. S.
    JOURNAL OF AGROMETEOROLOGY, 2008, 10 : 249 - 260
  • [39] Indirect Treatment Comparison/Network Meta-Analysis Study Questionnaire to Assess Relevance and Credibility to Inform Health Care Decision Making: An ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Good Practice Task Force Report
    Jansen, Jeroen P.
    Trikalinos, Thomas
    Cappelleri, Joseph C.
    Daw, Jessica
    Andes, Sherry
    Eldessouki, Randa
    Salanti, Georgia
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (02) : 157 - 173
  • [40] AFFECT REGULATION AND DECISION MAKING IN HEALTH-CARE PROFFESIONALS: TYPOLOGY APPROACH
    Kamhalova, Ivana
    Halama, Peter
    Gurnakova, Jitka
    STUDIA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2013, 55 (01) : 19 - 31