Harmonization of Detailed Clinical Models with Clinical Study Data Standards

被引:15
作者
Jiang, G. [1 ]
Evans, J. [2 ]
Oniki, T. A. [3 ]
Coyle, J. F. [3 ]
Bain, L. [2 ]
Huff, S. M. [3 ]
Kush, R. D. [2 ]
Chute, C. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Biomed Stat & Informat, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Clin Data Interchange Stand Consortium, Austin, TX USA
[3] Intermt Healthcare, Intermt Med Ctr, Murray, UT USA
关键词
Detailed Clinical Model (DCM); data standards; Clinical Information Modeling Initiative (CIMI); Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC); clinical study; electronic health records (EHR); GALEN;
D O I
10.3414/ME13-02-0019
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Introduction: This article is part of the Focus Theme of Methods of Information in Medicine on "Managing Interoperability and Complexity in Health Systems". Background: Data sharing and integration between the clinical research data management system and the electronic health record system remains a challenging issue. To approach the issue, there is emerging interest in utilizing the Detailed Clinical Model (DCM) approach across a variety of contexts. The Intermountain Healthcare Clinical Element Models (CEMs) have been adopted by the Office of the National Coordinator awarded Strategic Health IT Advanced Research Projects for normalization (SHARPn) project for normalizing patient data from the electronic health records (EHR). Objective: The objective of the present study is to describe our preliminary efforts toward harmonization of the SHARPn CEMs with CDISC (Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium) clinical study data standards. Methods: We were focused on three generic domains: demographics, lab tests, and medications. We performed a panel review on each data element extracted from the CDISC templates and SHARPn CEMs. Results: We have identified a set of data elements that are common to the context of both clinical study and broad secondary use of EHR data and discussed outstanding harmonization issues. Conclusions: We consider that the outcomes would be useful for defining new requirements for the DCM modeling community and ultimately facilitating the semantic interoperability between systems for both clinical study and broad secondary use domains.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 74
页数:10
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 11179 ISOIEC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 13972 ISODTS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, 11 OOPSLA WORKSH BEH
[4]  
Beale T, 2003, ST HEAL T, V96, P238
[5]  
Chute Christopher G, 2011, AMIA Annu Symp Proc, V2011, P248
[6]   Standards for detailed clinical models as the basis for medical data exchange and decision support [J].
Coyle, JF ;
Mori, AR ;
Huff, SM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2003, 69 (2-3) :157-174
[7]  
El Fadly A, 2007, AMIA Annu Symp Proc, P216
[8]   Detailed Clinical Models: A Review [J].
Goossen, William ;
Goossen-Baremans, Anneke ;
van der Zel, Michael .
HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS RESEARCH, 2010, 16 (04) :201-214
[9]  
Hammond William Edward, 2009, J AHIMA, V80, P44
[10]  
Huff SM, 2004, STUD HEALTH TECHNOL, V107, P1058