The effects of differential outcomes on learning and memory in young and aged rats

被引:4
作者
Rebeca Mateos, L. [1 ]
Madrigal, Kenneth [2 ]
Flores, Carlos [2 ]
Overmier, J. Bruce [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guadalajara, Inst Gest Conocimiento & el Aprendizaje Ambientes, Ave Paz 2453, Guadalajara 44140, Jalisco, Mexico
[2] Univ Guadalajara, Ctr Estudios & Invest Comportamiento, Fco Quevedo 180, Guadalajara 44130, Jalisco, Mexico
[3] Univ Minnesota, Dept Psychol, 75 E River Rd, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
Differential outcomes; Conditional discrimination; Learning; Memory; Young and aged rats; SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; RECOGNITION MEMORY; EXPECTANCIES; CHILDREN; ADULTS; DEFICITS;
D O I
10.1016/j.lmot.2015.10.004
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
It is claimed that using a differential outcomes procedure (DOP) generally results in (1) a faster acquisition of discrimination and (2) less disruption in accuracy when a delay interval is inserted between the stimulus cue and the opportunity to respond; this effect is best known as the differential outcomes effect (DOE). The DOE has been especially evident in aged participants. However, when acquisition in a matching-to-position task under DOP was compared to that under a non-differential outcomes procedure (NDO) by Savage, Pitkin, and Careri (1999), no difference in rate of acquisition was found between young and old rats. In the present experiment, we evaluated the effect of using a differential outcomes procedure on both learning and memory in young (3 months) and aged (24 months) rats in a more standard two-choice stimulus discrimination task. The results reported in this article showed in both young and aged subjects that DOP led to faster acquisition and less disruption in the percentage of correct responses as the delay interval was lengthened. These results confirm that employing DOP is an effective training strategy that can increase speed of acquisition and enhance memory in both young and aged subjects, with larger effects being seen in older rats. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 6
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
CHATLOSH DL, 1992, LEARNING AND MEMORY : THE BEHAVIORAL AND BIOLOGICAL SUBSTRATES, P61
[2]   EFFECTS OF DIFFERENTIAL REINFORCEMENT EXPECTANCIES ON SUCCESSIVE MATCHING-TO-SAMPLE PERFORMANCE IN PIGEONS [J].
DELONG, RE ;
WASSERMAN, EA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL BEHAVIOR PROCESSES, 1981, 7 (04) :394-412
[3]   PROACTIVE-INTERFERENCE EFFECTS ON SHORT-TERM-MEMORY IN RATS .2. EFFECTS IN YOUNG AND AGED RATS [J].
DUNNETT, SB ;
MARTEL, FL ;
IVERSEN, SD .
BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1990, 104 (05) :666-670
[4]  
DUNNETT SB, 1988, PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, V96, P174
[5]   Differential outcomes training improves face recognition memory in children and in adults with Down syndrome [J].
Esteban, Laura ;
Plaza, Victoria ;
Lopez-Crespo, Ginesa ;
Vivas, Ana B. ;
Estevez, Angeles F. .
RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2014, 35 (06) :1384-1392
[6]  
Estévez AF, 2003, AM J MENT RETARD, V108, P108, DOI 10.1352/0895-8017(2003)108<0108:DOEICA>2.0.CO
[7]  
2
[8]   The differential outcome effect as a useful tool to improve conditional discrimination learning in children [J].
Estévez, AF ;
Fuentes, LJ ;
Marí-Bêffa, P ;
González, C ;
Alvarez, D .
LEARNING AND MOTIVATION, 2001, 32 (01) :48-64
[9]  
Flores C., 2010, U PSYCHOL PANAMERICA, V9, P485
[10]   THE DIFFERENTIAL OUTCOMES EFFECT [J].
GOETERS, S ;
BLAKELY, E ;
POLING, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL RECORD, 1992, 42 (03) :389-411