Identification of conservation priorities in the major basins of Central Asia: Using an integrated GIS-based ordered weighted averaging approach

被引:23
作者
Li, Jiangyue [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Chen, Xi [1 ,4 ,6 ]
Kurban, Alishir [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Van de Voorde, Tim [3 ,4 ,5 ]
De Maeyer, Philippe [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Zhang, Chi [1 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Xinjiang Inst Ecol & Geog, State Key Lab Desert & Oasis Ecol, Urumqi 830011, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Ghent, Dept Geog, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[4] SinoBelgian Joint Lab Geoinformat, Urumqi 830011, Peoples R China
[5] SinoBelgian Joint Lab Geoinformat, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[6] Chinese Acad Sci, Res Ctr Ecol & Environm Cent Asia, Urumqi 830011, Peoples R China
[7] Linyi Univ, Coll Resources & Environm, Shandong Prov Key Lab Water & Soil Conservat & En, Linyi 276000, Shandong, Peoples R China
关键词
Four major basins; Conservation priorities; Ordering weight averaging (OWA); Ecosystem services (ESs); Driving factors; MULTIPLE ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; MULTICRITERIA EVALUATION; RIVER-BASIN; LAND-USE; VEGETATION DYNAMICS; DRIVING FACTORS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; YELLOW-RIVER; WATER; COVER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113442
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Ecosystem services (ESs) provided by the major basins of Central Asia are critical to human well-being and have attracted the attention of the international community. The identification of conservation priorities is of great significance for the maintenance and protection of key ESs. In this study, we quantified the spatiotemporal changes of net primary productivity (NPP), soil conservation (SC), water yield (WY) and habitat quality (HQ) in the major basins of Central Asia from 1995 to 2015. In addition, a GIS-based ordered weighted averaging (OWA) multi-criterion valuation method was adopted to identify potential conservation areas under 11 scenarios. Conservation priorities were determined by comparing the conservation efficiency under each scenario. Then, a broad range of indicators were considered to distinguish the driving factors affecting ESs in conservation priorities. The results show that the average conservation efficiency in the Issyk-Kul Basin was the highest, followed by the Am Darya Basin, Ili-Balkhash Basin and Syr Darya Basin. We observed that the conservation efficiency of the four ESs declined continuously in the Ili-Balkhash Basin from 1995 to 2015, while it changed steadily in the other three basins. Correlation analysis indicated that natural factors (e.g., precipitation and topography) were the main driving factors of WY, SR and NPP in conservation priorities, while HQ was more affected by socioeconomic factors (e.g., population density and both cropland and urban percentages). The identification of conservation priorities and their driving factors plays an important role in ensuring the ecological security of the lower reaches, regulating the regional water balance and stabilizing the climate pattern.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 91 条
  • [1] Ecosystem services capacity across heterogeneous forest types: understanding the interactions and suggesting pathways for sustaining multiple ecosystem services
    Alamgir, Mohammed
    Turton, Stephen M.
    Macgregor, Colin J.
    Pert, Petina L.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 566 : 584 - 595
  • [2] Satellite-observed vegetation stability in response to changes in climate and total water storage in Central Asia
    Bai, Jie
    Shi, Hao
    Yu, Qiang
    Xie, Zunyi
    Li, Longhui
    Luo, Geping
    Jin, Ning
    Li, Jun
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 659 : 862 - 871
  • [3] Quantifying the contributions of snow/glacier meltwater to river runoff in the Tianshan Mountains, Central Asia
    Chen, Haiyan
    Chen, Yaning
    Li, Weihong
    Li, Zhi
    [J]. GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, 2019, 174 : 47 - 57
  • [4] Analysis on impacts of hydro-climatic changes and human activities on available water changes in Central Asia
    Chen, Hui
    Liu, Hailong
    Chen, Xi
    Qiao, Yina
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 737
  • [5] Identification of ecosystem service bundles and driving factors in Beijing and its surrounding areas
    Chen, Tianqian
    Feng, Zhe
    Zhao, Huafu
    Wu, Kening
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 711
  • [6] Changes in land use/land cover and ecosystem services in Central Asia during 1990-2009
    Chen, Xi
    Bai, Jie
    Li, Xiaoyu
    Luo, Geping
    Li, Junli
    Li, B. Larry
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2013, 5 (01) : 116 - 127
  • [7] The combined use of Spatial Multicriteria Evaluation and stakeholders analysis for supporting the ecological planning of a river basin
    Comino, Elena
    Bottero, Marta
    Pomarico, Silvia
    Rosso, Maurizio
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2016, 58 : 183 - 195
  • [8] Conrad C., 2020, Remote sensing-based assessments of land use, soil and vegetation status, crop production and water use in irrigation systems of the Aral Sea Basin. A review., V11
  • [9] The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
    Costanza, R
    dArge, R
    deGroot, R
    Farber, S
    Grasso, M
    Hannon, B
    Limburg, K
    Naeem, S
    ONeill, RV
    Paruelo, J
    Raskin, RG
    Sutton, P
    vandenBelt, M
    [J]. NATURE, 1997, 387 (6630) : 253 - 260
  • [10] Changes in the global value of ecosystem services
    Costanza, Robert
    de Groot, Rudolf
    Sutton, Paul
    van der Ploeg, Sander
    Anderson, Sharolyn J.
    Kubiszewski, Ida
    Farber, Stephen
    Turner, R. Kerry
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2014, 26 : 152 - 158