Hydrogen losses in fueling station operation

被引:53
作者
Genovese, Matteo [1 ]
Blekhman, David [2 ]
Dray, Michael [3 ]
Fragiacomo, Petronilla [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calabria, Dept Mech Energy & Management Engn, I-87036 Cosenza, Italy
[2] Calif State Univ Los Angeles, Dept Technol, Hydrogen Res & Fueling Facil, Los Angeles, CA 90032 USA
[3] Hydrogen Res & Fueling Facil, Los Angeles, CA 90032 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Hydrogen station; Recommended practices; Hydrogen assessment; Hydrogen accounting; Leakage prevention;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119266
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper describes an engineering approach for hydrogen accounting from production to dispensing at Cal State Los Angeles Hydrogen Research and Fueling Facility, equipped with an electrolyzer for on-site production. Particularly, the accounting process has been carried out by taking an in-depth look at current practices and databases, and its analysis has been based on data from quarterly reports of hydrogen production and dispensing related parameters and from its data acquisition system. It is described how the station addressed this analysis investigating several station areas. Following there is an assessment of the possible critical points, flanked by considerations, calculations, mathematical modeling and analysis of the database. The analysis led to a marked improvement on the station operation know-how. For most of the analyzed months the current average percentage of losses was found to be between 2 and 10%, whereas before it was between 30 and 35%. This current range of percentage (2-10)% includes all experiments done, defueling the buffer tanks, rebooting the dispenser, venting the lines, the uncertainty of the mass flow meter inside the dispenser (+/- 5%) and the inherent uncertainty of Faraday's law for hydrogen production estimate. Among all areas analyzed, maintenance activities revealed themselves as the most critical ones, leading to data mismatching in hydrogen accounting. The paper aims also to provide a guideline with recommended practices based on our experience, deduced for station operators and builders, including several steps for leakage monitoring, prevention, and troubleshooting. (c) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Review and evaluation of hydrogen production options for better environment [J].
Acar, Canan ;
Dincer, Ibrahim .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 218 :835-849
[2]   Environmental impacts and behavioral drivers of deep decarbonization for transportation through electric vehicles [J].
Ahmadi, Pouria .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 225 :1209-1219
[3]  
[Anonymous], GLOB MARK HYDR FUEL
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, RETAIL HYDROGEN FUEL
[5]  
[Anonymous], INTRO FLUID MECH
[6]  
[Anonymous], CALCULATION FLOW RAT
[7]  
[Anonymous], NREL HYDROGEN STATIO
[8]  
Barbir F., 2013, PEM Fuel Cells, VSecond, P373, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-387710-9.00010-2, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-387710-9.00010-2]
[9]   Energetic evaluation of hydrogen refueling stations with liquid or gaseous stored hydrogen [J].
Bauer, Artur ;
Mayer, Thomas ;
Semmel, Malte ;
Morales, Martin Alberto Guerrero ;
Wind, Joerg B. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2019, 44 (13) :6795-6812
[10]   Optimal configuration and pressure levels of electrolyzer plants in context of power-to-gas applications [J].
Bensmann, B. ;
Hanke-Rauschenbach, R. ;
Mueller-Syring, G. ;
Henel, M. ;
Sundmacher, K. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 167 :107-124