Analyzing Hydration Differences in Cocrystal Polymorphs: High-Resolution X-ray Investigation of Caffeine-Glutaric Acid Cocrystals

被引:7
|
作者
Hawkins, Bryson A. [1 ]
Han, Jaeyeon [1 ]
Du, Jonathan J. [1 ,2 ]
Lai, Felcia [1 ]
Stanton, Stephen A. [1 ]
Divakarla, Shravan S. [1 ]
Groundwater, Paul W. [1 ]
Platts, James A. [3 ]
Hibbs, David E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney Sch Pharm, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Emory Univ, Dept Biochem, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[3] Cardiff Univ, Sch Chem, Cardiff CF10 3AT, Wales
关键词
THEORETICAL CHARGE-DENSITY; EXPERIMENTAL ELECTRON-DENSITY; CENTER-DOT-O; HYDROGEN-BOND; LATTICE ENERGIES; MOLECULAR PACKING; CRYSTALS; TRANSFERABILITY; DISTRIBUTIONS; DIFFRACTION;
D O I
10.1021/acs.cgd.1c00358
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Two polymorphic forms of caffeine (CAF)-glutaric acid (GLU) cocrystals have been studied via high-resolution X-ray crystallography and Bader's quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM). For both the monoclinic, 1, and triclinic, 2, systems the experimental charge density distributions of the 1:1 ratio of CAF and GLU polymorphs have been determined and compared. Previous studies have determined that 1 is less stable than 2, in relative humidity (RH) testing. A topological analysis of the electron density distribution (EDD) revealed little difference between the two polymorph internal systems. The packing densities (0.76 vs 0.74) and lattice energies (-101.1 vs -107.1 kJ mol(-1)) of 1 and 2, respectively, are nearly equivalent, implying that the differences in hygroscopicity between the two polymorphs are not due to crystal lattice porosity or stability. A topological analysis of the number and strength of hydrogen bonds for 1 and 2 revealed nine hydrogen bonds in both polymorphs. "Classical" (O-H center dot center dot center dot X) hydrogen bonds were similarly present in both polymorphs, stabilizing the cocrystals. However, the sum of the stability produced from the "nonclassical" (C-H center dot center dot center dot X) bonds is higher in 2: -27.6 vs -38.2 kJ mol(-1) for 1 and 2, respectively. One of the nine hydrogen bonds in 1 and 2 varies from the others, caused by the torsional rotation of the aliphatic carbon chain in GLU. This bond is critical for packing stabilization, creating a parallelogram-like packing arrangement in 2 in comparison to ribboning in 1. A Hirshfeld surface analysis found that the percentages of O-H center dot center dot center dot X hydrogen bonds were nearly identical in 1 and 2 (23.9% vs 22.1%); however, the H center dot center dot center dot H contacts were higher in 2 (61.4% vs 65.8% for 1 and 2, respectively), suggesting that more hydrogen-based contacts require competitive displacement by water in the hydration of 2 in comparison to 1. Additionally, a stabilizing aromatic cycle stack between CAF molecules is present in 2 due to the varied parallelogram packing arrangement, which was absent in 1; this provided similar to 11.3 kJ mol(-1) of stability to the system of 2. The solid-state entropies and molecular dipole moments (MDMs) of 1 and 2 supported the relative stability of the individual polymorphs, with 1 having a higher entropy and dipole moment in comparison to 2 (123.2 vs 112.8 J K-1 mol(-1) and 7.45 and 4.93 D for 1 and 2, respectively), implying that it has the potential to hydrate more rapidly. These findings are in good agreement with previous experimental RH stability studies, giving further insight into the information gained from thermally averaged ground-state crystal electron density data.
引用
收藏
页码:4456 / 4467
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Structural Basis for Mechanical Anisotropy in Polymorphs of a Caffeine-Glutaric Acid Cocrystal
    Mishra, Manish Kumar
    Mishra, Kamini
    Narayan, Aditya
    Reddy, C. Malla
    Vangala, Venu R.
    CRYSTAL GROWTH & DESIGN, 2020, 20 (10) : 6306 - 6315
  • [2] Cocrystal Dissociation under Controlled Humidity: A Case Study of Caffeine-Glutaric Acid Cocrystal Polymorphs
    Thakuria, Ranjit
    Arhangelskis, Mihails
    Eddleston, Mark D.
    Chow, Ernest H. H.
    Sarmah, Kashyap Kumar
    Aldous, Barry J.
    Krzyzaniak, Joseph F.
    Jones, William
    ORGANIC PROCESS RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 23 (05) : 845 - 851
  • [3] Thermal and in Situ X-ray Diffraction Analysis of a Dimorphic Co-Crystal, 1:1 Caffeine-Glutaric Acid
    Vangala, Venu R.
    Chow, Pui Shan
    Schreyer, Martin
    Lau, Grace
    Tan, Reginald B. H.
    CRYSTAL GROWTH & DESIGN, 2016, 16 (02) : 578 - 586
  • [4] Thermal analysis, X-ray powder diffraction and electron microscopy data related with the production of 1:1 Caffeine:Glutaric Acid cocrystals
    Duarte, Iris
    Andrade, Rita
    Pinto, Joao F.
    Temtem, Marcio
    DATA IN BRIEF, 2016, 8 : 247 - 250
  • [5] HIGH-RESOLUTION X-RAY TOPOGRAPHY
    KOHLER, R
    APPLIED PHYSICS A-MATERIALS SCIENCE & PROCESSING, 1994, 58 (03): : 149 - 157
  • [6] High-resolution x-ray monochromators
    Ishikawa, T
    Tamasaku, K
    Yabashi, M
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2005, 547 (01): : 42 - 49
  • [7] High-resolution X-ray multilayers
    Martynov, VV
    Platonov, Y
    Kazimirov, A
    Bilderback, DH
    SYNCHROTRON RADIATION INSTRUMENTATION, 2004, 705 : 697 - 700
  • [8] A HIGH-RESOLUTION X-RAY FACILITY
    CHEN, H
    KURIYAMA, M
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, 1981, 14 (AUG) : 280 - 280
  • [9] HIGH-RESOLUTION X-RAY TECHNIQUES
    LAL, K
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PURE & APPLIED PHYSICS, 1981, 19 (09) : 854 - 862
  • [10] HIGH-RESOLUTION X-RAY CAMERA
    KHOL, F
    ROSICKA, V
    CESKOSLOVENSKY CASOPIS PRO FYSIKU SEKCE A, 1975, 25 (05): : 489 - &