Sensitivity of seedling recruitment to moss, litter and dominant removal in an oligotrophic wet meadow

被引:76
作者
Spackova, I
Kotorova, I
Leps, J
机构
[1] Univ S Bohemia, Fac Biol Sci, Dept Bot, CZ-37005 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic
[2] Acad Sci Czech Republ, Inst Entomol, CZ-37005 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic
关键词
analysis of deviance; competition; manipulative experiment; regeneration niche; redundancy analysis;
D O I
10.1007/BF02914928
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The effect of a dominant species, the litter layer, and the moss layer on seedlings and established vegetation was evaluated in two manipulative experiments in an oligotrophic wet meadow (Molinion with some features of Violion caninae according to phytosociological classification). In the first experiment the dominant species (Nardus stricta), litter layer and litter layer together with the moss layer were removed and the response of the established vegetation and seedlings were compared with a control. Results revealed that after one season there was no significant effect of the treatments on established vegetation, but seedling recruitment was significantly affected. The greatest increase of seedling recruitment for many species was observed in the plots with the moss layer removed. In the second experiment, seeds of Selinum carvifolia were sown into plots subjected to the following treatments: complete vegetation removal, mowing, mowing combined with removal of the moss layer, and an untreated control. The highest number of seedlings was found in plots with the vegetation removed, but the seedling recruitment was nearly as high in plots with the moss layer removed. Low numbers were found in mown plots and the lowest in the untreated control. The results show that seedling recruitment is more sensitive to competition than the established vegetation, at least over one season.This supports the idea of the importance of the regeneration niche for the maintenance of diversity in grassland communities.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 30
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, NATURE MANAGEMENT GR, DOI DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02346.x
[2]  
Benkert D., 1976, EXKURSIONSFLORA GEBI, V4, P663
[3]  
Csapody V, 1968, KEIMLINGSBESTIMMUNGS
[4]   BRYOPHYTE INTERACTIONS WITH OTHER PLANTS [J].
DURING, HJ ;
VANTOOREN, BF .
BOTANICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 1990, 104 (1-3) :79-98
[5]   INTERACTIONS AFTER DEATH - PLANT LITTER CONTROLS PRIORITY EFFECTS IN A SUCCESSIONAL PLANT COMMUNITY [J].
FACELLI, JM ;
FACELLI, E .
OECOLOGIA, 1993, 95 (02) :277-282
[6]   Generating and testing predictions about community structure: Which theory is relevant and can it be tested with observational data? [J].
Goldberg, D .
FOLIA GEOBOTANICA & PHYTOTAXONOMICA, 1995, 30 (04) :511-518
[7]  
Grime J.P., 1998, COMP PLANT ECOLOGY, P53
[8]  
Grime JP, 1979, PLANT STRATEGIES VEG
[9]   MAINTENANCE OF SPECIES-RICHNESS IN PLANT COMMUNITIES - IMPORTANCE OF REGENERATION NICHE [J].
GRUBB, PJ .
BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 1977, 52 (01) :107-145
[10]  
HILLIER SH, 1990, CALCAREOUS GRASSLAND, P57