Shared Decision-Making for Lung Cancer Screening

被引:39
作者
Nishi, Shawn P. E. [1 ]
Lowenstein, Lisa M. [2 ]
Mendoza, Tito R. [3 ]
Lopez, Maria A. [2 ]
Crocker, Laura C. [2 ]
Sepucha, Karen [4 ]
Niu, Jiangong [2 ]
Volk, Robert J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Med Branch, Div Pulm Crit Care & Sleep Med, Dept Internal Med, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Div Canc Prevent & Populat Sci, Dept Symptom Res, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Harvard Med Sch, Div Gen Internal Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
decision aids; lung cancer screening; shared decision-making; CARE PROVIDERS; EXPECTATIONS; STATEMENT; BENEFITS; BARRIERS; IMPACT; HARMS; TESTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.chest.2021.01.041
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Lung cancer screening (LCS) reduces lung cancer mortality, but it also carries a range of risks. Shared decision-making (SDM) is a process of engaging patients in their health care decisions and is a vital component of LCS. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the quality of SDM among patients recently assessed for LCS? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study of screened patients recruited from two academic tertiary care centers in the South Central Region of the United States. Self-reported surveys assessed patient demographics, values related to outcomes of LCS, knowledge, SDM components including receipt of educational materials, and decisional conflict. RESULTS: Recently screened patients (n = 266) possessed varied LCS knowledge, answering an average of 41.4% of questions correctly. Patients valued finding cancer early over concerns about harms. Patients indicated that LCS benefits were presented to them by a health care provider far more often than harms (68.3% vs 20.8%, respectively), and 30.7% reported they received educational materials about LCS during the screening process. One-third of patients had some decisional conflict (33.6%) related to their screening decisions, whereas most patients (86.6%) noted that they were involved in the screening decision as much as they wanted. In multivariate models, non-White race and having less education were related to lower knowledge scores. Non-White patients and former smokers were more likely to be conflicted about the screening decision. Most patients (n = 227 [85.3%]) indicated that a health care provider had discussed smoking cessation or abstinence with them. INTERPRETATION: Among recently screened patients, the quality of decision-making about LCS is highly variable. The low use of educational materials including decision aids and imbalance of conveying benefit vs risk information to patients is concerning. A structured approach using decision aids may assist with providing a balanced presentation of information and may improve the quality of SDM.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 340
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
[31]   Lung Cancer Screening, Version 1.2015 Featured Updates to the NCCN Guidelines [J].
Wood, Douglas E. ;
Kazerooni, Ella ;
Baum, Scott L. ;
Dransfield, Mark T. ;
Eapen, George A. ;
Ettinger, David S. ;
Hou, Lifang ;
Jackman, David M. ;
Klippenstein, Donald ;
Kumar, Rohit ;
Lackner, Rudy P. ;
Leard, Lorriana E. ;
Leung, Ann N. C. ;
Makani, Samir S. ;
Massion, Pierre P. ;
Meyers, Bryan F. ;
Otterson, Gregory A. ;
Peairs, Kimberly ;
Pipavath, Sudhakar ;
Pratt-Pozo, Christie ;
Reddy, Chakravarthy ;
Reid, Mary E. ;
Rotter, Arnold J. ;
Sachs, Peter B. ;
Schabath, Matthew B. ;
Sequist, Lecia V. ;
Tong, Betty C. ;
Travis, William D. ;
Yang, Stephen C. ;
Gregory, Kristina M. ;
Hughes, Miranda .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2015, 13 (01) :23-34