Shared Decision-Making for Lung Cancer Screening

被引:39
作者
Nishi, Shawn P. E. [1 ]
Lowenstein, Lisa M. [2 ]
Mendoza, Tito R. [3 ]
Lopez, Maria A. [2 ]
Crocker, Laura C. [2 ]
Sepucha, Karen [4 ]
Niu, Jiangong [2 ]
Volk, Robert J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Med Branch, Div Pulm Crit Care & Sleep Med, Dept Internal Med, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Div Canc Prevent & Populat Sci, Dept Symptom Res, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Harvard Med Sch, Div Gen Internal Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
decision aids; lung cancer screening; shared decision-making; CARE PROVIDERS; EXPECTATIONS; STATEMENT; BENEFITS; BARRIERS; IMPACT; HARMS; TESTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.chest.2021.01.041
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Lung cancer screening (LCS) reduces lung cancer mortality, but it also carries a range of risks. Shared decision-making (SDM) is a process of engaging patients in their health care decisions and is a vital component of LCS. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the quality of SDM among patients recently assessed for LCS? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study of screened patients recruited from two academic tertiary care centers in the South Central Region of the United States. Self-reported surveys assessed patient demographics, values related to outcomes of LCS, knowledge, SDM components including receipt of educational materials, and decisional conflict. RESULTS: Recently screened patients (n = 266) possessed varied LCS knowledge, answering an average of 41.4% of questions correctly. Patients valued finding cancer early over concerns about harms. Patients indicated that LCS benefits were presented to them by a health care provider far more often than harms (68.3% vs 20.8%, respectively), and 30.7% reported they received educational materials about LCS during the screening process. One-third of patients had some decisional conflict (33.6%) related to their screening decisions, whereas most patients (86.6%) noted that they were involved in the screening decision as much as they wanted. In multivariate models, non-White race and having less education were related to lower knowledge scores. Non-White patients and former smokers were more likely to be conflicted about the screening decision. Most patients (n = 227 [85.3%]) indicated that a health care provider had discussed smoking cessation or abstinence with them. INTERPRETATION: Among recently screened patients, the quality of decision-making about LCS is highly variable. The low use of educational materials including decision aids and imbalance of conveying benefit vs risk information to patients is concerning. A structured approach using decision aids may assist with providing a balanced presentation of information and may improve the quality of SDM.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 340
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening [J].
Aberle, Denise R. ;
Adams, Amanda M. ;
Berg, Christine D. ;
Black, William C. ;
Clapp, Jonathan D. ;
Fagerstrom, Richard M. ;
Gareen, Ilana F. ;
Gatsonis, Constantine ;
Marcus, Pamela M. ;
Sicks, JoRean D. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 365 (05) :395-409
[2]   Baseline Characteristics of Participants in the Randomized National Lung Screening Trial [J].
Aberle, Denise R. ;
Adams, Amanda M. ;
Berg, Christine D. ;
Clapp, Jonathan D. ;
Clingan, Kathy L. ;
Gareen, Ilana F. ;
Lynch, David A. ;
Marcus, Pamela M. ;
Pinsky, Paul F. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2010, 102 (23) :1771-1779
[3]   Shared Decision Making - The Pinnacle of Patient-Centered Care [J].
Barry, Michael J. ;
Edgman-Levitan, Susan .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 366 (09) :780-781
[4]   Evaluating Shared Decision Making for Lung Cancer Screening [J].
Brenner, Alison T. ;
Malo, Ted L. ;
Margolis, Marjorie ;
Lafata, Jennifer Elston ;
James, Shynah ;
Vu, Maihan B. ;
Reuland, Daniel S. .
JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 178 (10) :1311-1316
[5]   Comparison of Three Measures of Shared Decision Making: SDM Process_4, CollaboRATE, and SURE Scales [J].
Brodney, Suzanne ;
Fowler, Floyd J. ;
Barry, Michael J. ;
Chang, Yuchiao ;
Sepucha, Karen .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2019, 39 (06) :673-680
[6]  
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2015, DECISION MEMO SCREEN
[7]   Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument [J].
Couet, Nicolas ;
Desroches, Sophie ;
Robitaille, Hubert ;
Vaillancourt, Hugues ;
Leblanc, Annie ;
Turcotte, Stephane ;
Elwyn, Glyn ;
Legare, France .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2015, 18 (04) :542-561
[8]   This Week in the Journal [J].
de Koning, H. J. ;
van der Aalst, C. M. ;
de Jong, P. A. ;
Scholten, E. T. ;
Nackaerts, K. ;
Heuvelmans, M. A. ;
Lammers, J. -W. J. ;
Weenink, C. ;
Yousaf-Khan, U. ;
Horeweg, N. ;
van't Westeinde, S. ;
Prokop, M. ;
Mali, W. P. ;
Hoesein, F. A. A. Mohamed ;
van Ooijen, P. M. A. ;
Aerts, J. G. J. V. ;
den Bakker, M. A. ;
Thunnissen, E. ;
Verschakelen, J. ;
Vliegenthart, R. ;
Walter, J. E. ;
ten Haaf, K. ;
Groen, H. J. M. ;
Oudkerk, M. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 382 (06) :503-513
[9]  
Fowler FJ, 2017, SOC MED DEC MAK ANN
[10]   Decisional Conflict Scale Use over 20 Years: The Anniversary Review [J].
Garvelink, Mirjam M. ;
Boland, Laura ;
Klein, Krystal ;
Don Vu Nguyen ;
Menear, Matthew ;
Bekker, Hilary L. ;
Eden, Karen B. ;
LeBlanc, Annie ;
O'Connor, Annette M. ;
Stacey, Dawn ;
Legare, France .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2019, 39 (04) :301-314