Validation of LensHooke® X1 PRO and Computer-Assisted Semen Analyzer Compared with Laboratory-Based Manual Semen Analysis

被引:14
作者
Agarwal, Ashok [1 ]
Selvam, Manesh Kumar Panner [1 ]
Ambar, Rafael F. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Amer Ctr Reprod Med, Mail Code X-11,10681 Carnegie Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Ideia Fertil Inst Human Reprod, Urol Dept, Ctr Univ Saude ABC, Androl Grp, Santo Andre, SP, Brazil
[3] Hope Clin Human Reprod, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Computer assisted semen analyzer; Lensllooke (R) X1 PRO; IVOS CASA; Semen analysis; MALE-FERTILITY; SPERM QUALITY; SQA-V; FREQUENCY; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.5534/wjmh.200185
中图分类号
R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To compare two automated semen quality analysis systems (lerisllooke (R) X1 PRO [X1 PRO]) and IVOS CASA) for accuracy, precision and agreement with laboratory-based manual semen analysis (MSA). Materials and Methods: Semen samples (n=31) were obtained from normozoospermic healthy male volunteers and infertile men with a minimum abstinence period between 2-3 days. After complete liquefaction, 101 seminal aliquots were prepared and tested according to WHO 5th Edition (2010) guidelines. The results obtained by X1 PRO and IVOS CASA were compared with that of MSA. Additionally, 10 samples were used to evaluate the intra- and inter-rater agreement for X1 PRO and MSA. Results: The semen parameters (sperm concentration, total, and progressive motility) showed strong correlation and agreement for both automated semen analyzers and MSA (Spearman's rank correlation >= 0.92, p<0.0001). X1 PRO and IVOS CLASA were able to differentiate samples with abnormal concentration with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 100%. Furthermore, the PPV for X1 PRO (86.5%) was higher than that for IVOS CASA (71.7%) in differentiating samples with abnormal motility. The X1 PRO device showed a high PPV (97.7%) in identifying normal sperm forms compared to MSA. Semen parameters evaluated showed a high inter-rater (kappa >0.91) and intra-rater (kappa >0.92) agreement for X1 PRO compared with MSA. Conclusions: Both automated semen analyzers demonstrated a high level of concordance and their performance was comparable with MSA analysis. Furthermore, high-levels of inter-and intra-rater reliability for semen analysis indicate that the new X1 PRO can be used in a clinical laboratory to offer accurate and quick test results.
引用
收藏
页码:496 / 505
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [21] Computer-aided sperm analysis: past, present and future
    Lu, J. C.
    Huang, Y. F.
    Lu, N. Q.
    [J]. ANDROLOGIA, 2014, 46 (04) : 329 - 338
  • [22] INFLUENCE OF IMAGE SAMPLING FREQUENCY ON THE PERCEIVED MOVEMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF PROGRESSIVELY MOTILE HUMAN-SPERMATOZOA
    MORTIMER, D
    SERRES, C
    MORTIMER, ST
    JOUANNET, P
    [J]. GAMETE RESEARCH, 1988, 20 (03): : 313 - 327
  • [23] The future of computer-aided sperm analysis
    Mortimer, Sharon T.
    van der Horst, Gerhard
    Mortimer, David
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2015, 17 (04) : 545 - 553
  • [24] Manual vs. computer-assisted sperm analysis: can CASA replace manual assessment of human semen in clinical practice?
    Talarczyk-Desole, Joanna
    Berger, Anna
    Taszarek-Hauke, Grazyna
    Hauke, Jan
    Pawelczyk, Leszek
    Jedrzejczak, Piotr
    [J]. GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2017, 88 (02) : 56 - 60
  • [25] Validation of a novel computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) system using multitarget-tracking algorithms
    Tomlinson, Mathew James
    Pooley, Karen
    Simpson, Tracey
    Newton, Thomas
    Hopkisson, James
    Jayaprakasan, Kannamanadias
    Jayaprakasan, Rajisha
    Naeem, Asad
    Pridmore, Tony
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 93 (06) : 1911 - 1920
  • [26] Limitations of semen analysis as a test of male fertility and anticipated needs from newer tests
    Wang, Christina
    Swerdloff, Ronald S.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2014, 102 (06) : 1502 - 1507
  • [27] YEUNG CH, 1993, J ANDROL, V14, P222