Pepper Rootstock and Scion Physiological Responses Under Drought Stress

被引:56
|
作者
Lopez-Serrano, Lidia [1 ]
Canet-Sanchis, Guillermo [1 ]
Selak, Gabriela Vuletin [2 ]
Penella, Consuelo [1 ]
San Bautista, Alberto [3 ]
Lopez-Galarza, Salvador [3 ]
Calatayud, Angeles [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Valenciano Invest Agr, Dept Hort, Valencia, Spain
[2] Inst Adriat Crops & Karst Reclamat, Dept Plant Sci, Split, Croatia
[3] Univ Politecn Valencia, Dept Prod Vegetal, Valencia, Spain
来源
关键词
drought; gas exchange; grafted; oxidative stress; pepper; rootstock; water relations; ANTIOXIDATIVE DEFENSE SYSTEM; INCREASING SALT TOLERANCE; WATER-USE EFFICIENCY; NITRATE REDUCTASE; TOMATO PLANTS; POSTTRANSLATIONAL REGULATION; OSMOTIC ADJUSTMENT; RECIPROCAL GRAFTS; WHEAT; PHOTOSYNTHESIS;
D O I
10.3389/fpls.2019.00038
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
In vegetables, tolerance to drought can be improved by grafting commercial varieties onto drought tolerant rootstocks. Grafting has emerged as a tool that copes with drought stress. In previous results, the A25 pepper rootstock accession showed good tolerance to drought in fruit production terms compared with non-grafted plants and other rootstocks. The aim of this work was to study if short-term exposure to drought in grafted plants using A25 as a rootstock would show tolerance to drought now. To fulfill this objective, some physiological processes involved in roots (rootstock) and leaves (scion) of grafted pepper plants were analyzed. Pepper plants not grafted (A), self-grafted (A/A), and grafted onto a tolerant pepper rootstock A25 (A/A25) were grown under severe water stress induced by PEG addition (-0.55 MPa) or under control conditions for 7 days in hydroponic pure solution. According to our results, water stress severity was alleviated by using the A25 rootstock in grafted plants (A/A25), which indicated that mechanisms stimulated by roots are essential to withstand stress. A/A25 had a bigger root biomass compared with plants A and A/A that resulted in better water absorption, water retention capacity and a sustained CO2 assimilation rate. Consequently, plants A/A25 had a better carbon balance, supported by greater nitrate reductase activity located mainly in leaves. In the non-grafted and self-grafted plants, the photosynthesis rate lowered due to stomatal closure, which limited transpiration. Consequently, part of NO3- uptake was reduced in roots. This condition limited water uptake and CO2 fixation in plants A and A/A under drought stress, and accelerated oxidative damage by producing reactive oxygen species (ROS) and H2O2, which were highest in their leaves, indicating great sensitivity to drought stress and induced membrane lipid peroxidation. However, drought deleterious effects were slightly marked in plants A compared to A/A. To conclude, the A25 rootstock protects the scion against oxidative stress, which is provoked by drought, and shows better C and N balances that enabled the biomass to be maintained under water stress for short-term exposure, with higher yields in the field.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Physiological Responses of Turfgrass Species to Drought Stress under High Desert Conditions
    Leksungnoen, Nisa
    Johnson, Paul G.
    Kjelgren, Roger K.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2012, 47 (01) : 105 - 111
  • [32] Seed germination and physiological responses of quinoa to selenium priming under drought stress
    Gholami, Shocofeh
    Dehaghi, Majid Amini
    Rezazadeh, Alireza
    Naji, Amir Mohammad
    BRAGANTIA, 2022, 81
  • [33] Physiological responses of two halophytic grass species under drought stress environment
    Siddiqui, Zamin Shaheed
    Shahid, Huda
    Cho, Jung-Il
    Park, Sung-Han
    Ryu, Tae-Hun
    Park, Soo-Chul
    ACTA BOTANICA CROATICA, 2016, 75 (01) : 31 - 38
  • [34] Rootstock control of scion response to water stress in grapevine
    Tramontini, Sara
    Vitali, Marco
    Centioni, Luna
    Schubert, Andrea
    Lovisolo, Claudio
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2013, 93 : 20 - 26
  • [35] Biochemical and physiological responses of two grapevine rootstock genotypes to drought and salt treatments
    Meggio, F.
    Prinsi, B.
    Negri, A. S.
    Di Lorenzo, G. Simone
    Lucchini, G.
    Pitacco, A.
    Failla, O.
    Scienza, A.
    Cocucci, M.
    Espen, L.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF GRAPE AND WINE RESEARCH, 2014, 20 (02) : 310 - 323
  • [36] Physiological and biochemical responses of sorghum to drought stress
    Goche, T.
    Chivasa, S.
    Ngara, R.
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2017, 109 : 336 - 336
  • [37] Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Medicagotruncatula to Drought Stress
    Hegab, M. M.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2016, 56 (03): : 895 - 912
  • [38] Physiological Responses of Almond Genotypes to Drought Stress
    Gohari, S.
    Imani, A.
    Talaei, A. R.
    Abdossi, V.
    Asghari, M. R.
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 70 (06)
  • [39] Physiological Responses of Almond Genotypes to Drought Stress
    S. Gohari
    A. Imani
    A. R. Talaei
    V. Abdossi
    M. R. Asghari
    Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2023, 70
  • [40] Responses of Potential Rootstock Hybrids (Vinifera × American) to Drought and Salt Stress
    Damla Yüksel Küskü
    Gökhan Söylemezoğlu
    Erwerbs-Obstbau, 2023, 65 : 2143 - 2152