Gambling versus investment: Lay theory and loss aversion

被引:14
作者
Shang, Xuesong [1 ]
Duan, Hebing [1 ]
Lu, Jingyi [1 ]
机构
[1] East China Normal Univ, Sch Psychol & Cognit Sci, Shanghai Key Lab Mental Hlth & Psychol Crisis Int, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Lay theory; Loss aversion; Domain specificity; Gambling; Investment; PROSPECT-THEORY; RISK-TAKING; GAINS; ATTENTION; AVAILABILITY; DECISIONS; SCALE; LONG; RUN;
D O I
10.1016/j.joep.2021.102367
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Gambling and investment are two domains that involve financial decisions. The present research investigates people's lay theories about gambling and investment, and how these lay theories affect loss aversion in these domains. Lay people's understanding of gambling and investment is often largely based on information that is immediately available to them. Moreover, information about losing money by gambling and earning money through investments are more predominant than information about earning money by gambling and losing money through investments. Hence, we hypothesized and found that people tend to hold lay theories that gambling is more likely to cause losses and less likely to bring gains compared to investment (Study 1); and we observed a stronger loss aversion when the same monetary decision was framed as gambling rather than as an investment (Studies 2 to 6). This domain-framing effect held in both hypothetical and incentivized settings.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Agnew J.R., 2005, J BEHAV FINANC, V6, P57, DOI DOI 10.1207/S15427579JPFM0602_2
  • [2] The conceptual and empirical relationship between gambling, investing, and speculation
    Arthur, Jennifer N.
    Williams, Robert J.
    Delfabbro, Paul H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL ADDICTIONS, 2016, 5 (04) : 580 - 591
  • [3] The Consistency of Visual Attention to Losses and Loss Sensitivity Across Valuation and Choice
    Ashby, Nathaniel J. S.
    Yechiam, Eldad
    Ben-Eliezer, Daniel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2018, 147 (12) : 1791 - 1809
  • [4] Risks for the long run: A potential resolution of asset pricing puzzles
    Bansal, R
    Yaron, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2004, 59 (04) : 1481 - 1509
  • [5] Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study
    Bar-Haim, Yair
    Lamy, Dominique
    Pergamin, Lee
    Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J.
    van IJzendoorn, Marinus H.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2007, 133 (01) : 1 - 24
  • [6] Forms of gambling, gambling involvement and problem gambling: evidence from a Swedish population survey
    Binde, Per
    Romild, Ulla
    Volberg, Rachel A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL GAMBLING STUDIES, 2017, 17 (03) : 490 - 507
  • [7] DECISION FIELD-THEORY - A DYNAMIC COGNITIVE APPROACH TO DECISION-MAKING IN AN UNCERTAIN ENVIRONMENT
    BUSEMEYER, JR
    TOWNSEND, JT
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1993, 100 (03) : 432 - 459
  • [8] Money illusion, financial literacy and numeracy: Experimental evidence
    Darriet, Elisa
    Guille, Marianne
    Vergnaud, Jean-Christophe
    Shimizu, Mariko
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 76
  • [9] Investing versus gambling: experimental evidence of multi-domain risk attitudes
    Deck, Cary
    Lee, Jungmin
    Reyes, Javier
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2014, 21 (01) : 19 - 23
  • [10] Home Alone: Why People Believe Others' Social Lives Are Richer Than Their Own
    Deri, Sebastian
    Davidai, Shai
    Gilovich, Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 113 (06) : 858 - 877